The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Purpose: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and eviden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emilio Quaia, Antonio Giulio Gennari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2018;volume=26;issue=3;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=Quaia
id doaj-569044743e46410db9ff0a7dcc03b992
record_format Article
spelling doaj-569044743e46410db9ff0a7dcc03b9922020-11-25T00:33:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Ultrasound0929-64412212-15522018-01-0126312813310.4103/JMU.JMU_12_17The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasoundEmilio QuaiaAntonio Giulio GennariPurpose: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and evidence of liver metastases on unenhanced ultrasound (US) underwent CEUS. CEUS consisted of continuous liver parenchyma scanning during arterial (15–35 s after microbubble injection), portal venous (40–120 s), and late phase (from 120 s up to microbubble disappearance). Subjective conspicuity index (ranging from 1 to 5) and objective conspicuity index (Ilesion–Iliver/Iliver, I = signal intensity) were calculated on reference frames selected on arterial phase and every 20 s on portal venous and late phase. Results: A total number of 40 liver metastases were identified after microbubble injection. The highest liver metastasis conspicuity was observed on early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) both on visual (mean subjective conspicuity index ± standard deviation [SD] = 4.36 ± 0.75, reader 1; 4.25 ± 0.65, reader 2) and quantitative analysis (mean objective conspicuity index ± SD = −0.99 ± 0.001). Conclusion: The early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) provides the best liver metastases' conspicuity after microbubble contrast agent injection.http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2018;volume=26;issue=3;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=QuaiaLivermetastasismicrobubble contrast agent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emilio Quaia
Antonio Giulio Gennari
spellingShingle Emilio Quaia
Antonio Giulio Gennari
The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Liver
metastasis
microbubble contrast agent
author_facet Emilio Quaia
Antonio Giulio Gennari
author_sort Emilio Quaia
title The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title_short The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title_full The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title_fullStr The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title_sort most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Ultrasound
issn 0929-6441
2212-1552
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and evidence of liver metastases on unenhanced ultrasound (US) underwent CEUS. CEUS consisted of continuous liver parenchyma scanning during arterial (15–35 s after microbubble injection), portal venous (40–120 s), and late phase (from 120 s up to microbubble disappearance). Subjective conspicuity index (ranging from 1 to 5) and objective conspicuity index (Ilesion–Iliver/Iliver, I = signal intensity) were calculated on reference frames selected on arterial phase and every 20 s on portal venous and late phase. Results: A total number of 40 liver metastases were identified after microbubble injection. The highest liver metastasis conspicuity was observed on early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) both on visual (mean subjective conspicuity index ± standard deviation [SD] = 4.36 ± 0.75, reader 1; 4.25 ± 0.65, reader 2) and quantitative analysis (mean objective conspicuity index ± SD = −0.99 ± 0.001). Conclusion: The early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) provides the best liver metastases' conspicuity after microbubble contrast agent injection.
topic Liver
metastasis
microbubble contrast agent
url http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2018;volume=26;issue=3;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=Quaia
work_keys_str_mv AT emilioquaia themostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT antoniogiuliogennari themostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT emilioquaia mostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT antoniogiuliogennari mostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
_version_ 1725316542617354240