The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China

This study aims to investigate the relationship of firm performance and corporate social responsibility reporting and the moderating role of a firm’s life cycle stages in Chinese listed companies. We used the sample of all A-share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges for the per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naveed Jan, Arodh Lal Karn, Zeyun Li, Xiyu Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10038
id doaj-5681a21a890e4ff79f641afb99dc0f48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5681a21a890e4ff79f641afb99dc0f482021-09-26T01:27:52ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-09-0113100381003810.3390/su131810038The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from ChinaNaveed Jan0Arodh Lal Karn1Zeyun Li2Xiyu Liu3Department of Management Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250000, ChinaSchool of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, ChinaSchool of Humanity, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, MalaysiaDepartment of Management Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250000, ChinaThis study aims to investigate the relationship of firm performance and corporate social responsibility reporting and the moderating role of a firm’s life cycle stages in Chinese listed companies. We used the sample of all A-share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges for the period 2010 to 2020. The authors used pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression as a baseline methodology. Our regression results show that positive Corporate social responsibility (CSR) activity significantly reduces the performance of the firm. In addition, the negative link between positive Corporate social responsibility and a firm’s performance is more pronounced for firms in mature life cycle stages. Our results are robust to alternative proxy measures of ROA for firm performance, corporate social responsibility reporting, and life cycle stages. To control the possible problem of endogeneity, we use a one-year lag and 2SLS least squares regression. We find that firm performance has a statistically significant influence on CSR reporting. Moreover, we see that firms with high performance are more likely to report CSR activities than low-performance firms. Additionally, six out of ten control variables (Independent Director, Board Shares, State Owned Enterprise, Board Meeting, Chief executive officer Duality, and Firm Growth) have positive influences on CSR reporting. These findings hold for a set of robustness tests. Our results have implications for the development of CSR reporting in developing countries such as China. Our research suggests that, in China, firms with better financial performance undertake more CSR reporting. This paper contributes to the existing literature by investigating the effect of firm performance on CSR reporting and the moderating role of a firm’s life cycle stages in Chinese listed companies. Additionally, this paper enriches the current literature on CSR reporting and highlights the importance of a firm’s financial performance for better environmental performance and reporting.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10038corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR)firm performance (FP)corporate life cycle stages (FLCS)stakeholder theory (ST)life cycle theory (LCT)legitimacy theory (LT)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naveed Jan
Arodh Lal Karn
Zeyun Li
Xiyu Liu
spellingShingle Naveed Jan
Arodh Lal Karn
Zeyun Li
Xiyu Liu
The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
Sustainability
corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR)
firm performance (FP)
corporate life cycle stages (FLCS)
stakeholder theory (ST)
life cycle theory (LCT)
legitimacy theory (LT)
author_facet Naveed Jan
Arodh Lal Karn
Zeyun Li
Xiyu Liu
author_sort Naveed Jan
title The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
title_short The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
title_full The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
title_fullStr The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Performance and the Moderating Role of Firm Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from China
title_sort relationship between corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance and the moderating role of firm life cycle stages: evidence from china
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-09-01
description This study aims to investigate the relationship of firm performance and corporate social responsibility reporting and the moderating role of a firm’s life cycle stages in Chinese listed companies. We used the sample of all A-share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges for the period 2010 to 2020. The authors used pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression as a baseline methodology. Our regression results show that positive Corporate social responsibility (CSR) activity significantly reduces the performance of the firm. In addition, the negative link between positive Corporate social responsibility and a firm’s performance is more pronounced for firms in mature life cycle stages. Our results are robust to alternative proxy measures of ROA for firm performance, corporate social responsibility reporting, and life cycle stages. To control the possible problem of endogeneity, we use a one-year lag and 2SLS least squares regression. We find that firm performance has a statistically significant influence on CSR reporting. Moreover, we see that firms with high performance are more likely to report CSR activities than low-performance firms. Additionally, six out of ten control variables (Independent Director, Board Shares, State Owned Enterprise, Board Meeting, Chief executive officer Duality, and Firm Growth) have positive influences on CSR reporting. These findings hold for a set of robustness tests. Our results have implications for the development of CSR reporting in developing countries such as China. Our research suggests that, in China, firms with better financial performance undertake more CSR reporting. This paper contributes to the existing literature by investigating the effect of firm performance on CSR reporting and the moderating role of a firm’s life cycle stages in Chinese listed companies. Additionally, this paper enriches the current literature on CSR reporting and highlights the importance of a firm’s financial performance for better environmental performance and reporting.
topic corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR)
firm performance (FP)
corporate life cycle stages (FLCS)
stakeholder theory (ST)
life cycle theory (LCT)
legitimacy theory (LT)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10038
work_keys_str_mv AT naveedjan therelationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT arodhlalkarn therelationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT zeyunli therelationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT xiyuliu therelationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT naveedjan relationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT arodhlalkarn relationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT zeyunli relationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
AT xiyuliu relationshipbetweencorporatesocialresponsibilityreportingandfirmperformanceandthemoderatingroleoffirmlifecyclestagesevidencefromchina
_version_ 1716868947774537728