Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea
The recent emergence of the “urban commons” is associated with the “exclusion” problems of modern cities, which are enmeshed in the mechanism that spatially excludes those who are incapable of paying the market prices. Cities are also tightly regulated by various government regulations that control...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2020-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of the Commons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/1038 |
id |
doaj-567b45aa694d45578ac12d26d07b7e5a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-567b45aa694d45578ac12d26d07b7e5a2020-11-25T03:53:57ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812020-09-0114110.5334/ijc.1038481Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South KoreaIn Kwon Park0Jiyon Shin1Jin Eon Kim2Seoul National UniversitySeoul National UniversitySeoul National UniversityThe recent emergence of the “urban commons” is associated with the “exclusion” problems of modern cities, which are enmeshed in the mechanism that spatially excludes those who are incapable of paying the market prices. Cities are also tightly regulated by various government regulations that control people’s actions, and creative practices are often stifled. The excluded not only resist commercialization, privatization, and state laws but also crave and pursue their own space and lifestyle. This study argues that the urban commons is a “haven” where the excluded are protected, existing as an alternative that outreaches the state and market ambits. We examine a Korean case to see how urban commons are created to embrace the excluded, focusing on the settings and process. The results show that (1) social exclusion and a power rift between the market and state during the urban process constitute the settings in which communities of the excluded create urban commons as a haven; (2) the creation and maintenance process should not only meet Ostrom’s design principles but also requires urban commoners to practice commoning as an alternative lifestyle; and (3) the urban settings pose threats to meeting the process requirements, so appropriate strategies should be employed to bridge the gaps.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/1038urban commonshavensocial exclusioncommoningurban process |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
In Kwon Park Jiyon Shin Jin Eon Kim |
spellingShingle |
In Kwon Park Jiyon Shin Jin Eon Kim Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea International Journal of the Commons urban commons haven social exclusion commoning urban process |
author_facet |
In Kwon Park Jiyon Shin Jin Eon Kim |
author_sort |
In Kwon Park |
title |
Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea |
title_short |
Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea |
title_full |
Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea |
title_fullStr |
Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea |
title_full_unstemmed |
Urban Commons as a Haven for the Excluded: An Experience of Creating a Commons in Seoul, South Korea |
title_sort |
urban commons as a haven for the excluded: an experience of creating a commons in seoul, south korea |
publisher |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
series |
International Journal of the Commons |
issn |
1875-0281 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
The recent emergence of the “urban commons” is associated with the “exclusion” problems of modern cities, which are enmeshed in the mechanism that spatially excludes those who are incapable of paying the market prices. Cities are also tightly regulated by various government regulations that control people’s actions, and creative practices are often stifled. The excluded not only resist commercialization, privatization, and state laws but also crave and pursue their own space and lifestyle. This study argues that the urban commons is a “haven” where the excluded are protected, existing as an alternative that outreaches the state and market ambits. We examine a Korean case to see how urban commons are created to embrace the excluded, focusing on the settings and process. The results show that (1) social exclusion and a power rift between the market and state during the urban process constitute the settings in which communities of the excluded create urban commons as a haven; (2) the creation and maintenance process should not only meet Ostrom’s design principles but also requires urban commoners to practice commoning as an alternative lifestyle; and (3) the urban settings pose threats to meeting the process requirements, so appropriate strategies should be employed to bridge the gaps. |
topic |
urban commons haven social exclusion commoning urban process |
url |
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/1038 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT inkwonpark urbancommonsasahavenfortheexcludedanexperienceofcreatingacommonsinseoulsouthkorea AT jiyonshin urbancommonsasahavenfortheexcludedanexperienceofcreatingacommonsinseoulsouthkorea AT jineonkim urbancommonsasahavenfortheexcludedanexperienceofcreatingacommonsinseoulsouthkorea |
_version_ |
1724475750103384064 |