Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology

The aim of the paper was to determine the production costs and profitability of biomass production from Virginia mallow including various harvesting technologies. The paper covered theoretical calculation of the production costs of biomass form Virginia mallow with the use of the computer applicatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kwaśniewski Dariusz, Kuboń Maciej, Malaga-Toboła Urszula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/14/e3sconf_icores2020_01010.pdf
id doaj-565c59d50ec34be3803da2df6e478cee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-565c59d50ec34be3803da2df6e478cee2021-04-02T11:43:28ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011540101010.1051/e3sconf/202015401010e3sconf_icores2020_01010Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technologyKwaśniewski Dariusz0Kuboń MaciejMalaga-Toboła Urszula1Department of Production Organization, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, University of Agriculture in KrakowDepartment of Production Organization, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, University of Agriculture in KrakowThe aim of the paper was to determine the production costs and profitability of biomass production from Virginia mallow including various harvesting technologies. The paper covered theoretical calculation of the production costs of biomass form Virginia mallow with the use of the computer application “Biocalculator”. Calculations were made for a plantation with the surface area of 5 ha and four technologies of harvesting and the product form (pressed straw, chaff). The paper determines the profitability of production of biomass from Virginia mallow for four variants of sale prices of biomass at the level of 100, 120, 140 and 150 PLN∙t-1. In case of T1 technology all assumed prices of sale of Virginia mallow biomass with the obtained production costs were profitable. On the other hand, in T3 and T4 technology, the scope of sale prices from 120 to 150 PLN∙t-1 caused that the biomass production was profitable. While, the least profitable was application of T2 technology where only at the assessment of biomass sale 150 PLN∙t-1 production was profitable and in the remaining price options the profit was not obtained.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/14/e3sconf_icores2020_01010.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kwaśniewski Dariusz
Kuboń Maciej
Malaga-Toboła Urszula
spellingShingle Kwaśniewski Dariusz
Kuboń Maciej
Malaga-Toboła Urszula
Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Kwaśniewski Dariusz
Kuboń Maciej
Malaga-Toboła Urszula
author_sort Kwaśniewski Dariusz
title Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
title_short Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
title_full Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
title_fullStr Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
title_full_unstemmed Profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
title_sort profitability of biomass production in relation to harvesting technology
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The aim of the paper was to determine the production costs and profitability of biomass production from Virginia mallow including various harvesting technologies. The paper covered theoretical calculation of the production costs of biomass form Virginia mallow with the use of the computer application “Biocalculator”. Calculations were made for a plantation with the surface area of 5 ha and four technologies of harvesting and the product form (pressed straw, chaff). The paper determines the profitability of production of biomass from Virginia mallow for four variants of sale prices of biomass at the level of 100, 120, 140 and 150 PLN∙t-1. In case of T1 technology all assumed prices of sale of Virginia mallow biomass with the obtained production costs were profitable. On the other hand, in T3 and T4 technology, the scope of sale prices from 120 to 150 PLN∙t-1 caused that the biomass production was profitable. While, the least profitable was application of T2 technology where only at the assessment of biomass sale 150 PLN∙t-1 production was profitable and in the remaining price options the profit was not obtained.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/14/e3sconf_icores2020_01010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kwasniewskidariusz profitabilityofbiomassproductioninrelationtoharvestingtechnology
AT kubonmaciej profitabilityofbiomassproductioninrelationtoharvestingtechnology
AT malagatobołaurszula profitabilityofbiomassproductioninrelationtoharvestingtechnology
_version_ 1721571567538798592