Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
There is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2010-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/full |
id |
doaj-565609183ed641abb71c08f807786979 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-565609183ed641abb71c08f8077869792020-11-25T01:08:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782010-11-01110.3389/fpsyg.2010.001967530Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressureNicole Tai Tee Ong0Alison eBowcock1Nicola Jane Hodges2University of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaThere is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We expected these effects to also be moderated by when in practice these instructions are given. Across two experiments, five groups practiced a forehand disc throwing task and we manipulated the timing and attentional focus of instructions. Internally-directed instructions provided to participants early in practice resulted in a slower rate of acquisition (outcome error) and detrimental effects under stress, in comparison to the same instructions provided later in practice or not at all. Externally-directed, technical instructions positively impacted rate of acquisition and regardless of when in practice they were provided, there were no adverse effects associated with instructions under pressure. These results show that the direction of attention encouraged by instructions moderates performance under stress as does the timing of presentation of these instructions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/fullPracticestressmotor learningattentional focusautomaticitychoking |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicole Tai Tee Ong Alison eBowcock Nicola Jane Hodges |
spellingShingle |
Nicole Tai Tee Ong Alison eBowcock Nicola Jane Hodges Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure Frontiers in Psychology Practice stress motor learning attentional focus automaticity choking |
author_facet |
Nicole Tai Tee Ong Alison eBowcock Nicola Jane Hodges |
author_sort |
Nicole Tai Tee Ong |
title |
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
title_short |
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
title_full |
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
title_fullStr |
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
title_sort |
manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
There is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We expected these effects to also be moderated by when in practice these instructions are given. Across two experiments, five groups practiced a forehand disc throwing task and we manipulated the timing and attentional focus of instructions. Internally-directed instructions provided to participants early in practice resulted in a slower rate of acquisition (outcome error) and detrimental effects under stress, in comparison to the same instructions provided later in practice or not at all. Externally-directed, technical instructions positively impacted rate of acquisition and regardless of when in practice they were provided, there were no adverse effects associated with instructions under pressure. These results show that the direction of attention encouraged by instructions moderates performance under stress as does the timing of presentation of these instructions. |
topic |
Practice stress motor learning attentional focus automaticity choking |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicoletaiteeong manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure AT alisonebowcock manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure AT nicolajanehodges manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure |
_version_ |
1725184644918280192 |