Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure

There is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Tai Tee Ong, Alison eBowcock, Nicola Jane Hodges
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/full
id doaj-565609183ed641abb71c08f807786979
record_format Article
spelling doaj-565609183ed641abb71c08f8077869792020-11-25T01:08:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782010-11-01110.3389/fpsyg.2010.001967530Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressureNicole Tai Tee Ong0Alison eBowcock1Nicola Jane Hodges2University of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaThere is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We expected these effects to also be moderated by when in practice these instructions are given. Across two experiments, five groups practiced a forehand disc throwing task and we manipulated the timing and attentional focus of instructions. Internally-directed instructions provided to participants early in practice resulted in a slower rate of acquisition (outcome error) and detrimental effects under stress, in comparison to the same instructions provided later in practice or not at all. Externally-directed, technical instructions positively impacted rate of acquisition and regardless of when in practice they were provided, there were no adverse effects associated with instructions under pressure. These results show that the direction of attention encouraged by instructions moderates performance under stress as does the timing of presentation of these instructions.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/fullPracticestressmotor learningattentional focusautomaticitychoking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicole Tai Tee Ong
Alison eBowcock
Nicola Jane Hodges
spellingShingle Nicole Tai Tee Ong
Alison eBowcock
Nicola Jane Hodges
Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
Frontiers in Psychology
Practice
stress
motor learning
attentional focus
automaticity
choking
author_facet Nicole Tai Tee Ong
Alison eBowcock
Nicola Jane Hodges
author_sort Nicole Tai Tee Ong
title Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
title_short Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
title_full Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
title_fullStr Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
title_full_unstemmed Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
title_sort manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2010-11-01
description There is evidence that prescriptive versus discovery methods of learning can lead to breakdowns under pressure due to reinvestment of knowledge and a more conscious, controlled mode of control. There is some speculation that this breakdown is mediated by the attentional focus of the instructions. We expected these effects to also be moderated by when in practice these instructions are given. Across two experiments, five groups practiced a forehand disc throwing task and we manipulated the timing and attentional focus of instructions. Internally-directed instructions provided to participants early in practice resulted in a slower rate of acquisition (outcome error) and detrimental effects under stress, in comparison to the same instructions provided later in practice or not at all. Externally-directed, technical instructions positively impacted rate of acquisition and regardless of when in practice they were provided, there were no adverse effects associated with instructions under pressure. These results show that the direction of attention encouraged by instructions moderates performance under stress as does the timing of presentation of these instructions.
topic Practice
stress
motor learning
attentional focus
automaticity
choking
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoletaiteeong manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure
AT alisonebowcock manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure
AT nicolajanehodges manipulationstothetimingandtypeofinstructionstoexaminemotorskillperformanceunderpressure
_version_ 1725184644918280192