Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly – a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer

For manufacturing companies, especially for machine and plant manufacturers, the assembly of products in time has an essential impact on meeting delivery dates. Often missing individual components lead to a delayed assembly start, hereinafter referred to as <italic>assembly start delayers</...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Burggraf, Johannes Wagner, Benjamin Heinbach, Fabian Steinberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9416418/
id doaj-564a99c8a3cf4ed495d23cdd918e0197
record_format Article
spelling doaj-564a99c8a3cf4ed495d23cdd918e01972021-08-02T23:00:35ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362021-01-01910592610593810.1109/ACCESS.2021.30756209416418Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order ManufacturerPeter Burggraf0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9018-9959Johannes Wagner1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-2457Benjamin Heinbach2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-2855Fabian Steinberg3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9842-5343Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of International Production Engineering and Management (IPEM), University of Siegen, Siegen, GermanyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of International Production Engineering and Management (IPEM), University of Siegen, Siegen, GermanyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of International Production Engineering and Management (IPEM), University of Siegen, Siegen, GermanyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of International Production Engineering and Management (IPEM), University of Siegen, Siegen, GermanyFor manufacturing companies, especially for machine and plant manufacturers, the assembly of products in time has an essential impact on meeting delivery dates. Often missing individual components lead to a delayed assembly start, hereinafter referred to as <italic>assembly start delayers</italic>. Identifying the assembly start delayers early in the production process can help to set countermeasures to meet the required delivery dates. In order to achieve this, we set up 24 prediction models on four different levels of detail utilizing different machine learning-algorithms &#x2013; six prediction models on every level of detail &#x2013; and applying a case-based research approach in order to identify the model with the highest model quality. The modeling approach on the four levels of detail is different. The models on the coarsest level of detail predict assembly start delayers utilizing a classification approach. The models on the three finer levels of detail predict assembly start delayers via a regression of different lead times and subsequent postprocessing operations to identify the assembly start delayers. After training of the 24 prediction models based on a real data set of a machine and plant manufacturer and evaluating their model quality, the classification model utilizing a Gradient Boosting classifier showed best results. Thus, performing a binary classification to identify assembly start delayers was the best modelling approach. With the achieved results, our study is a first approach to predict assembly start delayers and gives insights in the performance of different modeling approaches in the area of a production planning and control.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9416418/Production controlassemblyprediction methodslead time reductionmachine learningsupervised learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Burggraf
Johannes Wagner
Benjamin Heinbach
Fabian Steinberg
spellingShingle Peter Burggraf
Johannes Wagner
Benjamin Heinbach
Fabian Steinberg
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
IEEE Access
Production control
assembly
prediction methods
lead time reduction
machine learning
supervised learning
author_facet Peter Burggraf
Johannes Wagner
Benjamin Heinbach
Fabian Steinberg
author_sort Peter Burggraf
title Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
title_short Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
title_full Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
title_fullStr Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly &#x2013; a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer
title_sort machine learning-based prediction of missing components for assembly &#x2013; a case study at an engineer-to-order manufacturer
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2021-01-01
description For manufacturing companies, especially for machine and plant manufacturers, the assembly of products in time has an essential impact on meeting delivery dates. Often missing individual components lead to a delayed assembly start, hereinafter referred to as <italic>assembly start delayers</italic>. Identifying the assembly start delayers early in the production process can help to set countermeasures to meet the required delivery dates. In order to achieve this, we set up 24 prediction models on four different levels of detail utilizing different machine learning-algorithms &#x2013; six prediction models on every level of detail &#x2013; and applying a case-based research approach in order to identify the model with the highest model quality. The modeling approach on the four levels of detail is different. The models on the coarsest level of detail predict assembly start delayers utilizing a classification approach. The models on the three finer levels of detail predict assembly start delayers via a regression of different lead times and subsequent postprocessing operations to identify the assembly start delayers. After training of the 24 prediction models based on a real data set of a machine and plant manufacturer and evaluating their model quality, the classification model utilizing a Gradient Boosting classifier showed best results. Thus, performing a binary classification to identify assembly start delayers was the best modelling approach. With the achieved results, our study is a first approach to predict assembly start delayers and gives insights in the performance of different modeling approaches in the area of a production planning and control.
topic Production control
assembly
prediction methods
lead time reduction
machine learning
supervised learning
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9416418/
work_keys_str_mv AT peterburggraf machinelearningbasedpredictionofmissingcomponentsforassemblyx2013acasestudyatanengineertoordermanufacturer
AT johanneswagner machinelearningbasedpredictionofmissingcomponentsforassemblyx2013acasestudyatanengineertoordermanufacturer
AT benjaminheinbach machinelearningbasedpredictionofmissingcomponentsforassemblyx2013acasestudyatanengineertoordermanufacturer
AT fabiansteinberg machinelearningbasedpredictionofmissingcomponentsforassemblyx2013acasestudyatanengineertoordermanufacturer
_version_ 1721225858154233856