Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.

An RNA switch triggers biological functions by toggling between two conformations. RNA switches include bacterial riboswitches, where ligand binding can stabilize a bound structure. For RNAs with only one stable structure, structural prediction usually just requires a straightforward free energy min...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirhossein Manzourolajdad, John L Spouge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217625
id doaj-56452e78e30a43f9983c02dfe916af03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56452e78e30a43f9983c02dfe916af032021-03-03T20:38:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021762510.1371/journal.pone.0217625Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.Amirhossein ManzourolajdadJohn L SpougeAn RNA switch triggers biological functions by toggling between two conformations. RNA switches include bacterial riboswitches, where ligand binding can stabilize a bound structure. For RNAs with only one stable structure, structural prediction usually just requires a straightforward free energy minimization, but for an RNA switch, the prediction of a less stable alternative structure is often computationally costly and even problematic. The current sampling-clustering method predicts stable and alternative structures by partitioning structures sampled from the energy landscape into two clusters, but it is very time-consuming. Instead, we predict the alternative structure of an RNA switch from conditional probability calculations within the energy landscape. First, our method excludes base pairs related to the most stable structure in the energy landscape. Then, it detects stable stems ("seeds") in the remaining landscape. Finally, it folds an alternative structure prediction around a seed. While having comparable riboswitch classification performance, the conditional-probability computations had fewer adjustable parameters, offered greater predictive flexibility, and were more than one thousand times faster than the sampling step alone in sampling-clustering predictions, the competing standard. Overall, the described approach helps traverse thermodynamically improbable energy landscapes to find biologically significant substructures and structures rapidly and effectively.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217625
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amirhossein Manzourolajdad
John L Spouge
spellingShingle Amirhossein Manzourolajdad
John L Spouge
Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Amirhossein Manzourolajdad
John L Spouge
author_sort Amirhossein Manzourolajdad
title Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
title_short Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
title_full Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
title_fullStr Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
title_full_unstemmed Structural prediction of RNA switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
title_sort structural prediction of rna switches using conditional base-pair probabilities.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description An RNA switch triggers biological functions by toggling between two conformations. RNA switches include bacterial riboswitches, where ligand binding can stabilize a bound structure. For RNAs with only one stable structure, structural prediction usually just requires a straightforward free energy minimization, but for an RNA switch, the prediction of a less stable alternative structure is often computationally costly and even problematic. The current sampling-clustering method predicts stable and alternative structures by partitioning structures sampled from the energy landscape into two clusters, but it is very time-consuming. Instead, we predict the alternative structure of an RNA switch from conditional probability calculations within the energy landscape. First, our method excludes base pairs related to the most stable structure in the energy landscape. Then, it detects stable stems ("seeds") in the remaining landscape. Finally, it folds an alternative structure prediction around a seed. While having comparable riboswitch classification performance, the conditional-probability computations had fewer adjustable parameters, offered greater predictive flexibility, and were more than one thousand times faster than the sampling step alone in sampling-clustering predictions, the competing standard. Overall, the described approach helps traverse thermodynamically improbable energy landscapes to find biologically significant substructures and structures rapidly and effectively.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217625
work_keys_str_mv AT amirhosseinmanzourolajdad structuralpredictionofrnaswitchesusingconditionalbasepairprobabilities
AT johnlspouge structuralpredictionofrnaswitchesusingconditionalbasepairprobabilities
_version_ 1714821386441064448