Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret

Previous research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable of action orientation can influence ability to regulate negative affect. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd McElroy, Keith Dowd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2007-12-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm7808.pdf
id doaj-5643d169d67c4ddfbc0ee65886691dfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5643d169d67c4ddfbc0ee65886691dfa2021-05-02T01:09:18ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752007-12-012NA333341Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regretTodd McElroyKeith DowdPrevious research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable of action orientation can influence ability to regulate negative affect. The present set of studies was designed to investigate how both consistency factors and action-state personality orientation influence judgments of regret. In Study 1, we used a recalled life event to provide a situation in which the person had experienced either an action or inaction. Individuals with an action orientation experienced more regret for situations involving inaction (staying home) than situations involving action (going out). State-oriented individuals, however, maintained high levels of regret and did not differ in their regret ratings across either the action or inaction situations. In Study 2, participants made realistic choices involving either an action or inaction. Our findings revealed the same pattern of results: action-oriented individuals who chose an option that involved not acting (inaction) had more regret that individuals who chose an option that involved acting (action). State-oriented individuals experienced high levels of regret regardless of whether they chose to act or not to act. http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm7808.pdfactioninactionregretaction-state orientationindividual differences.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Todd McElroy
Keith Dowd
spellingShingle Todd McElroy
Keith Dowd
Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
Judgment and Decision Making
action
inaction
regret
action-state orientation
individual differences.
author_facet Todd McElroy
Keith Dowd
author_sort Todd McElroy
title Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
title_short Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
title_full Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
title_fullStr Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
title_full_unstemmed Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
title_sort action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2007-12-01
description Previous research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable of action orientation can influence ability to regulate negative affect. The present set of studies was designed to investigate how both consistency factors and action-state personality orientation influence judgments of regret. In Study 1, we used a recalled life event to provide a situation in which the person had experienced either an action or inaction. Individuals with an action orientation experienced more regret for situations involving inaction (staying home) than situations involving action (going out). State-oriented individuals, however, maintained high levels of regret and did not differ in their regret ratings across either the action or inaction situations. In Study 2, participants made realistic choices involving either an action or inaction. Our findings revealed the same pattern of results: action-oriented individuals who chose an option that involved not acting (inaction) had more regret that individuals who chose an option that involved acting (action). State-oriented individuals experienced high levels of regret regardless of whether they chose to act or not to act.
topic action
inaction
regret
action-state orientation
individual differences.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm7808.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT toddmcelroy actionorientationconsistencyandfeelingsofregret
AT keithdowd actionorientationconsistencyandfeelingsofregret
_version_ 1721496598298492928