Evaluating "superiority", "equivalence" and "non-inferiority" in clinical trials
Clinical studies are usually performed with the aim of justifying that a new treatment approach is "superr rior" to the common standard approach (active control) with respect to benefits. In a general sense, this justification is carried out on the basis of the "null hypothesis signif...
Main Authors: | Turan Fatma, Senocak Mustafa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Annals of Saudi Medicine |
Online Access: | http://www.saudiannals.net/article.asp?issn=0256-4947;year=2007;volume=27;issue=4;spage=284;epage=288;aulast=Turan |
Similar Items
-
Editorial on hypothesis and objectives in clinical trials: superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority
by: Bolaños Ricardo, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01) -
Equivalence and non inferiority trials
by: D’Agostino Ralph B
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Equivalence and Non-inferiority Trials of CAM
by: Edzard Ernst
Published: (2004-01-01) -
Seamless superiority/non-inferiority clinical trials
by: Gurary, Ellen
Published: (2019) -
Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs
by: Don van Ravenzwaaij, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)