Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study.
<h4>Background</h4>As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform decision-making. Little is known about how often RRs are produced in the publi...
Main Authors: | Chantelle Garritty, Mona Hersi, Candyce Hamel, Adrienne Stevens, Zarah Monfaredi, Claire Butler, Andrea C Tricco, Lisa Hartling, Lesley A Stewart, Vivian Welch, Kednapa Thavorn, Wei Cheng, David Moher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238025 |
Similar Items
-
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
by: Chantelle Garritty, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Predatory Journals and Publishers
by: Ahmet Aslan
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Publishing in Good Journals
by: Ian Sanders
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Publishing in an indexed journal
by: Narasimman Swaminathan
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Scholarly Journal Publishing
by: Kraft, Donald H.
Published: (2006)