Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems

The problems of the genesis and practice of Russian neocorporatism in the conditions of the information revolution have considered in the article. Neocorporatism, formed in the last third of the twentieth century, is undergoing a serious test of modality at the beginning of the twenty-first century...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. V. Tyan
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: State University of Management 2018-12-01
Series:Управление
Subjects:
Online Access:https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/64
id doaj-5624625a359646c7a050ccb92d64a56e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5624625a359646c7a050ccb92d64a56e2021-07-28T13:36:31ZrusState University of ManagementУправление2309-36332713-16452018-12-0164869410.26425/2309-3633-2018-4-86-9464Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problemsV. V. Tyan0Институт экономики и культурыThe problems of the genesis and practice of Russian neocorporatism in the conditions of the information revolution have considered in the article. Neocorporatism, formed in the last third of the twentieth century, is undergoing a serious test of modality at the beginning of the twenty-first century as a political and managerial concept. The moral aging of political ideas, doctrines, institutions is due to the nature of he development of society, the non-linear process of political modernization. Russian neokorporativizm (monosubject power (control) as anti-corporatism in practice passes the test of ethics. In the research of Russian neocorporatism the author is based on the analysis of political practice. In political science, the definitional problem of Russian neocorporatism has not yet solved. There is no clarity in the typological characteristic: democratic or bureaucratic? The author of the study considers Russian neocorporatism neotraditionalist. This conclusion is important for the analysis of domestic and foreign policy of the current government. The practice of Russian neocorporatism has highlighted the urgent problems of management. In the context of the information revolution and technological revolution, traditionalist and neotraditionalist methods of management lose their effectiveness. In the new realities, many of the principles of neo-corporatism are interpreted in the modern context and in their modality in political practice. The urgent management problems already can`t longer be solved by proven management methods in a changing environment. Scientific novelty of the research: solution of the definitional problem of non-corporatism, determination of the inertial nature of the management system functioning.https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/64powergenesisleadershipneocorporatismrussianmanagerialsystemevolutionethical
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. V. Tyan
spellingShingle V. V. Tyan
Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
Управление
power
genesis
leadership
neocorporatism
russian
managerial
system
evolution
ethical
author_facet V. V. Tyan
author_sort V. V. Tyan
title Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
title_short Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
title_full Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
title_fullStr Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
title_full_unstemmed Russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
title_sort russian neocorporatism as antineocorporate: urgent management problems
publisher State University of Management
series Управление
issn 2309-3633
2713-1645
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The problems of the genesis and practice of Russian neocorporatism in the conditions of the information revolution have considered in the article. Neocorporatism, formed in the last third of the twentieth century, is undergoing a serious test of modality at the beginning of the twenty-first century as a political and managerial concept. The moral aging of political ideas, doctrines, institutions is due to the nature of he development of society, the non-linear process of political modernization. Russian neokorporativizm (monosubject power (control) as anti-corporatism in practice passes the test of ethics. In the research of Russian neocorporatism the author is based on the analysis of political practice. In political science, the definitional problem of Russian neocorporatism has not yet solved. There is no clarity in the typological characteristic: democratic or bureaucratic? The author of the study considers Russian neocorporatism neotraditionalist. This conclusion is important for the analysis of domestic and foreign policy of the current government. The practice of Russian neocorporatism has highlighted the urgent problems of management. In the context of the information revolution and technological revolution, traditionalist and neotraditionalist methods of management lose their effectiveness. In the new realities, many of the principles of neo-corporatism are interpreted in the modern context and in their modality in political practice. The urgent management problems already can`t longer be solved by proven management methods in a changing environment. Scientific novelty of the research: solution of the definitional problem of non-corporatism, determination of the inertial nature of the management system functioning.
topic power
genesis
leadership
neocorporatism
russian
managerial
system
evolution
ethical
url https://upravlenie.guu.ru/jour/article/view/64
work_keys_str_mv AT vvtyan russianneocorporatismasantineocorporateurgentmanagementproblems
_version_ 1721272659156664320