Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations

There is an ongoing demand for organizations to become more agile in order to prosper amongst their competitors. Many military organizations have declared a renewed focus towards organizational agility. The goal of this research is to isolate the variables needed to measure organizational agility (O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Geiger, John Elshaw, David Jacques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/4/44
id doaj-562445a611944860951c0f55dc597c76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-562445a611944860951c0f55dc597c762020-11-25T04:07:54ZengMDPI AGSystems2079-89542020-11-018444410.3390/systems8040044Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military OrganizationsJeremy Geiger0John Elshaw1David Jacques2Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USAAir Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USAAir Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USAThere is an ongoing demand for organizations to become more agile in order to prosper amongst their competitors. Many military organizations have declared a renewed focus towards organizational agility. The goal of this research is to isolate the variables needed to measure organizational agility (OA) in military organizations, allowing for the future development of a suitable method to measure OA without the need to interact with outside organizations. This article begins by providing a suitable and formal definition of organizational agility by exploring and analyzing relevant scholarly literature on the subject. Related terms, such as organizational resiliency, flexibility, robustness, versatility, and adaptability are also explored to examine their definition boundaries and any overlapping areas. Existing methods to measure organizational agility are examined and summarized, and the current limitations to their application are highlighted. Previous studies to find characteristics associated with organizational agility were also examined, and an initial set of 88 organizational agility characteristics was built. Since these included possible redundant or overlapping characteristics, the Q-sort method was employed to discover, analyze, and eliminate redundant items from the dataset, ultimately resulting in 64 unique characteristics. The result is a suitable definition for organization agility applicable to military organizations and a list of potential associated characteristics that summarizes related research to date. This groundwork establishes the foundation to conduct a multi-organization study to further refine the characteristic list and ultimately develop a method to measure organizational agility.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/4/44organizational agilityresiliencyflexibilityrobustnessadaptabilitymeasure development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeremy Geiger
John Elshaw
David Jacques
spellingShingle Jeremy Geiger
John Elshaw
David Jacques
Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
Systems
organizational agility
resiliency
flexibility
robustness
adaptability
measure development
author_facet Jeremy Geiger
John Elshaw
David Jacques
author_sort Jeremy Geiger
title Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
title_short Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
title_full Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
title_fullStr Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Establishing the Foundations to Measure Organizational Agility for Military Organizations
title_sort establishing the foundations to measure organizational agility for military organizations
publisher MDPI AG
series Systems
issn 2079-8954
publishDate 2020-11-01
description There is an ongoing demand for organizations to become more agile in order to prosper amongst their competitors. Many military organizations have declared a renewed focus towards organizational agility. The goal of this research is to isolate the variables needed to measure organizational agility (OA) in military organizations, allowing for the future development of a suitable method to measure OA without the need to interact with outside organizations. This article begins by providing a suitable and formal definition of organizational agility by exploring and analyzing relevant scholarly literature on the subject. Related terms, such as organizational resiliency, flexibility, robustness, versatility, and adaptability are also explored to examine their definition boundaries and any overlapping areas. Existing methods to measure organizational agility are examined and summarized, and the current limitations to their application are highlighted. Previous studies to find characteristics associated with organizational agility were also examined, and an initial set of 88 organizational agility characteristics was built. Since these included possible redundant or overlapping characteristics, the Q-sort method was employed to discover, analyze, and eliminate redundant items from the dataset, ultimately resulting in 64 unique characteristics. The result is a suitable definition for organization agility applicable to military organizations and a list of potential associated characteristics that summarizes related research to date. This groundwork establishes the foundation to conduct a multi-organization study to further refine the characteristic list and ultimately develop a method to measure organizational agility.
topic organizational agility
resiliency
flexibility
robustness
adaptability
measure development
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/8/4/44
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremygeiger establishingthefoundationstomeasureorganizationalagilityformilitaryorganizations
AT johnelshaw establishingthefoundationstomeasureorganizationalagilityformilitaryorganizations
AT davidjacques establishingthefoundationstomeasureorganizationalagilityformilitaryorganizations
_version_ 1724427479276322816