Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse

The article is devoted to the study of mitigation strategies and tactics in scientific discourse on the material of English, German and Russian languages. Objectivity, accuracy, consistency and clarity of presentation are traditionally distinguished as the main style-forming factors of scientific di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darya Abuzyarova, Svetlana Takhtarova
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Karabuk University 2018-11-01
Series:Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/1839
id doaj-561d199eb4a240c583b1169ac938b7f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-561d199eb4a240c583b1169ac938b7f42020-11-25T01:59:21ZaraKarabuk UniversityTarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi2147-06262018-11-017422322910.7596/taksad.v7i4.1839Mitigation in the Scientific DiscourseDarya AbuzyarovaSvetlana TakhtarovaThe article is devoted to the study of mitigation strategies and tactics in scientific discourse on the material of English, German and Russian languages. Objectivity, accuracy, consistency and clarity of presentation are traditionally distinguished as the main style-forming factors of scientific discursive practice focused on scientific knowledge. At the same time, the anthropocentrism of modern linguistic science naturally led to the inclusion in the focus of research interest of the subjective components of the scientific discourse, in which the personality of the addressee of the scientific text is reflected and to which the category of mitigation can be properly attributed. The strategy of assertive mitigation is realized in the scientific text through ritualized tactics of deictic depersonalization and modalization. These tactics reflect the interaction of two tendencies - the subjective (the author's desire to show the scientific significance of his personal contribution to scientific research, or, on the contrary, to preserve the "face" by softening the categoricity of the presentation) and objective (the desire to present only facts and strong evidence). The paper proves that the assertive mitigation strategy realized in the analyzed languages by ritualized tactics of depersonalization and modalization plays an important role in scientific discourse and serves, in the final analysis, to preserve the "face" of the addressee of the scientific text.http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/1839discourse, mitigation, deixis, hedging, strategy and tactics.
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darya Abuzyarova
Svetlana Takhtarova
spellingShingle Darya Abuzyarova
Svetlana Takhtarova
Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi
discourse, mitigation, deixis, hedging, strategy and tactics.
author_facet Darya Abuzyarova
Svetlana Takhtarova
author_sort Darya Abuzyarova
title Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
title_short Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
title_full Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
title_fullStr Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation in the Scientific Discourse
title_sort mitigation in the scientific discourse
publisher Karabuk University
series Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi
issn 2147-0626
publishDate 2018-11-01
description The article is devoted to the study of mitigation strategies and tactics in scientific discourse on the material of English, German and Russian languages. Objectivity, accuracy, consistency and clarity of presentation are traditionally distinguished as the main style-forming factors of scientific discursive practice focused on scientific knowledge. At the same time, the anthropocentrism of modern linguistic science naturally led to the inclusion in the focus of research interest of the subjective components of the scientific discourse, in which the personality of the addressee of the scientific text is reflected and to which the category of mitigation can be properly attributed. The strategy of assertive mitigation is realized in the scientific text through ritualized tactics of deictic depersonalization and modalization. These tactics reflect the interaction of two tendencies - the subjective (the author's desire to show the scientific significance of his personal contribution to scientific research, or, on the contrary, to preserve the "face" by softening the categoricity of the presentation) and objective (the desire to present only facts and strong evidence). The paper proves that the assertive mitigation strategy realized in the analyzed languages by ritualized tactics of depersonalization and modalization plays an important role in scientific discourse and serves, in the final analysis, to preserve the "face" of the addressee of the scientific text.
topic discourse, mitigation, deixis, hedging, strategy and tactics.
url http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/1839
work_keys_str_mv AT daryaabuzyarova mitigationinthescientificdiscourse
AT svetlanatakhtarova mitigationinthescientificdiscourse
_version_ 1724965000256159744