‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-08-01
|
Series: | NeuroImage |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001 |
id |
doaj-55fd6ecfb0db40a6865faed9e5f0bb53 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-55fd6ecfb0db40a6865faed9e5f0bb532021-06-29T04:11:46ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-08-01236118023‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go taskShipra Kanjlia0Rita E. Loiotile1Nora Harhen2Marina Bedny3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Corresponding authors at: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 4909 Frew Street, PIttsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Facebook, United StatesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, United StatesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United StatesStudies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive ‘visual’ cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001PlasticityBlindnessExecutive functionExecutive demandResponse selectionPluripotency |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shipra Kanjlia Rita E. Loiotile Nora Harhen Marina Bedny |
spellingShingle |
Shipra Kanjlia Rita E. Loiotile Nora Harhen Marina Bedny ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task NeuroImage Plasticity Blindness Executive function Executive demand Response selection Pluripotency |
author_facet |
Shipra Kanjlia Rita E. Loiotile Nora Harhen Marina Bedny |
author_sort |
Shipra Kanjlia |
title |
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
title_short |
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
title_full |
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
title_fullStr |
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
title_sort |
‘visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
NeuroImage |
issn |
1095-9572 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive ‘visual’ cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness. |
topic |
Plasticity Blindness Executive function Executive demand Response selection Pluripotency |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shiprakanjlia visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask AT ritaeloiotile visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask AT noraharhen visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask AT marinabedny visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask |
_version_ |
1721355643632222208 |