‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task

Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shipra Kanjlia, Rita E. Loiotile, Nora Harhen, Marina Bedny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001
id doaj-55fd6ecfb0db40a6865faed9e5f0bb53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55fd6ecfb0db40a6865faed9e5f0bb532021-06-29T04:11:46ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-08-01236118023‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go taskShipra Kanjlia0Rita E. Loiotile1Nora Harhen2Marina Bedny3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Corresponding authors at: Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 346 Baker Hall, 4909 Frew Street, PIttsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Facebook, United StatesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, United StatesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United StatesStudies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive ‘visual’ cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001PlasticityBlindnessExecutive functionExecutive demandResponse selectionPluripotency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shipra Kanjlia
Rita E. Loiotile
Nora Harhen
Marina Bedny
spellingShingle Shipra Kanjlia
Rita E. Loiotile
Nora Harhen
Marina Bedny
‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
NeuroImage
Plasticity
Blindness
Executive function
Executive demand
Response selection
Pluripotency
author_facet Shipra Kanjlia
Rita E. Loiotile
Nora Harhen
Marina Bedny
author_sort Shipra Kanjlia
title ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
title_short ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
title_full ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
title_fullStr ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
title_full_unstemmed ‘Visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
title_sort ‘visual’ cortices of congenitally blind adults are sensitive to response selection demands in a go/no-go task
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Studies of occipital cortex plasticity in blindness provide insight into how intrinsic constraints interact with experience to determine cortical specialization. We tested the cognitive nature and anatomical origins of occipital responses during non-verbal, non-spatial auditory tasks. In a go/no-go task, congenitally blind (N=23) and sighted (N=24) individuals heard rapidly occurring (<1/s) non-verbal sounds and made one of two button presses (frequent-go 50%, infrequent-go 25%) or withheld a response (no-go, 25%). Rapid and frequent button presses heighten response selection/inhibition demands on the no-go trials: In sighted and blind adults a right-lateralized prefrontal (PFC) network responded most to no-go trials, followed by infrequent-go and finally frequent-go trials. In the blind group only, a right-lateralized occipital network showed the same response profile and the laterality of occipital and PFC responses was correlated across blind individuals. A second experiment with spoken sentences and equations (N=16) found that no-go responses in occipital cortex are distinct from previously identified occipital responses to spoken language. Finally, in resting-state data (N=30 blind, N=31 blindfolded sighted), no-go responsive ‘visual’ cortex of blind relative to sighted participants was more synchronized with PFC and less synchronized with primary auditory and sensory-motor cortices. No-go responsive occipital cortex showed higher resting-state correlations with no-go responsive PFC than language responsive inferior frontal cortex. We conclude that in blindness, a right-lateralized occipital network responds to non-verbal executive processes, including response selection. These results suggest that connectivity with fronto-parietal executive networks is a key mechanism for plasticity in blindness.
topic Plasticity
Blindness
Executive function
Executive demand
Response selection
Pluripotency
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003001
work_keys_str_mv AT shiprakanjlia visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask
AT ritaeloiotile visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask
AT noraharhen visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask
AT marinabedny visualcorticesofcongenitallyblindadultsaresensitivetoresponseselectiondemandsinagonogotask
_version_ 1721355643632222208