Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears

Purpose: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) occur commonly, especially among certain groups of individuals. In this meta-analysis, we aim to identify risk factors for RCTs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for 210 articles. Seventeen articles were selected for systematic review, of which 10 were eligible for met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan, Tan Hwee Chye Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684318
id doaj-55d9f216e9d0401c9680d6468cdd1518
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55d9f216e9d0401c9680d6468cdd15182020-11-25T03:19:22ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-02-012510.1177/2309499016684318Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tearsAndrew Arjun Sayampanathan0Tan Hwee Chye Andrew1 Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, SingaporePurpose: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) occur commonly, especially among certain groups of individuals. In this meta-analysis, we aim to identify risk factors for RCTs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for 210 articles. Seventeen articles were selected for systematic review, of which 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. Data was analysed with Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel–Haenszel statistics and random effect models. Results: A total of 6653 individuals were analysed. The odds of sustaining a RCT on the dominant hand was 2.30 times more than the non-dominant hand (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–5.25, Z = 1.99, p = 0.05; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.38, χ 2 = 8.84, df = 2 ( p = 0.01), I 2 = 77%). The odds of an individual aged 60 years and above sustaining a RCT was 5.07 times higher than an individual less than 60 years old (95% CI: 2.45–10.51, Z = 4.37, p < 0.001; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 25.24, df = 3 ( p < 0.001), I 2 = 88%). Female gender was not a significant association, with an odds ratio of 0.98 when compared to the male gender (95% CI: 0.66–1.45, Z = 0.09, p = 0.93; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.20, χ 2 = 44.24, df = 5 ( p < 0.001), I 2 = 89%). Conclusions: Hand dominance and older age are associated with RCTs. More studies are required for further assessment of associations and risk factors of RCTs.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684318
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan
Tan Hwee Chye Andrew
spellingShingle Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan
Tan Hwee Chye Andrew
Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan
Tan Hwee Chye Andrew
author_sort Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan
title Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
title_short Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
title_full Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
title_fullStr Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
title_sort systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Purpose: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) occur commonly, especially among certain groups of individuals. In this meta-analysis, we aim to identify risk factors for RCTs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for 210 articles. Seventeen articles were selected for systematic review, of which 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. Data was analysed with Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel–Haenszel statistics and random effect models. Results: A total of 6653 individuals were analysed. The odds of sustaining a RCT on the dominant hand was 2.30 times more than the non-dominant hand (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–5.25, Z = 1.99, p = 0.05; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.38, χ 2 = 8.84, df = 2 ( p = 0.01), I 2 = 77%). The odds of an individual aged 60 years and above sustaining a RCT was 5.07 times higher than an individual less than 60 years old (95% CI: 2.45–10.51, Z = 4.37, p < 0.001; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 25.24, df = 3 ( p < 0.001), I 2 = 88%). Female gender was not a significant association, with an odds ratio of 0.98 when compared to the male gender (95% CI: 0.66–1.45, Z = 0.09, p = 0.93; Heterogenity: τ 2 = 0.20, χ 2 = 44.24, df = 5 ( p < 0.001), I 2 = 89%). Conclusions: Hand dominance and older age are associated with RCTs. More studies are required for further assessment of associations and risk factors of RCTs.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684318
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewarjunsayampanathan systematicreviewonriskfactorsofrotatorcufftears
AT tanhweechyeandrew systematicreviewonriskfactorsofrotatorcufftears
_version_ 1724622850672820224