Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Vries Nanne K, Ickenroth Martine HP, Grispen Janaica EJ, Dinant Geert-Jan, Ronda Gaby, van der Weijden Trudy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/453
id doaj-55d46c48918644ddac1ec1784a2779a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55d46c48918644ddac1ec1784a2779a32020-11-25T00:33:29ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582010-08-0110145310.1186/1471-2458-10-453Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)de Vries Nanne KIckenroth Martine HPGrispen Janaica EJDinant Geert-JanRonda Gabyvan der Weijden Trudy<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva that are initiated by consumers to diagnose a particular disorder or risk factor without involving a medical professional. In 2006, 16% of a sample of Dutch Internet users had ever used at least one self-test and 17% intended to use a self-test in the future. The objectives of this study are to determine (1) the frequency of self-test use, (2) the consumers' reasons for using or not using a self-test, (3) the information that is used by self-testers in the different self-test stages and the consumers' interpretation of the quality of this information, (4) the consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour, (5) the information consumers report to need in the decision making process of using or not using a self-test, and in further management on the basis of the self-test result, and (6) the quality of the currently available consumer information on a selected set of self-tests.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Mixed methods study with (1) a cross-sectional study consisting of a two-phase Internet-questionnaire, (2) semi-structured interviews with self-testers and consumers who intend to use a self-test, and (3) the assessment of the quality of consumer information of self-tests. The Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour will serve as the theoretical basis for the questionnaires and the interview topic guides.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The self-testing area is still in a state of flux and therefore it is expected that self-test use will increase in the future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which combines quantitative and qualitative research to identify consumers' information needs and use concerning self-testing, and the consumers' actual follow-up behaviour based on the self-test result, and simultaneously investigates the quality of the currently available consumer information. The results of this study will be used as an input in developing consumer information on self-testing.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/453
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author de Vries Nanne K
Ickenroth Martine HP
Grispen Janaica EJ
Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
van der Weijden Trudy
spellingShingle de Vries Nanne K
Ickenroth Martine HP
Grispen Janaica EJ
Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
van der Weijden Trudy
Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
BMC Public Health
author_facet de Vries Nanne K
Ickenroth Martine HP
Grispen Janaica EJ
Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
van der Weijden Trudy
author_sort de Vries Nanne K
title Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_short Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_full Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_fullStr Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_full_unstemmed Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_sort improving behaviour in self-testing (ibis): study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2010-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva that are initiated by consumers to diagnose a particular disorder or risk factor without involving a medical professional. In 2006, 16% of a sample of Dutch Internet users had ever used at least one self-test and 17% intended to use a self-test in the future. The objectives of this study are to determine (1) the frequency of self-test use, (2) the consumers' reasons for using or not using a self-test, (3) the information that is used by self-testers in the different self-test stages and the consumers' interpretation of the quality of this information, (4) the consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour, (5) the information consumers report to need in the decision making process of using or not using a self-test, and in further management on the basis of the self-test result, and (6) the quality of the currently available consumer information on a selected set of self-tests.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Mixed methods study with (1) a cross-sectional study consisting of a two-phase Internet-questionnaire, (2) semi-structured interviews with self-testers and consumers who intend to use a self-test, and (3) the assessment of the quality of consumer information of self-tests. The Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour will serve as the theoretical basis for the questionnaires and the interview topic guides.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The self-testing area is still in a state of flux and therefore it is expected that self-test use will increase in the future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which combines quantitative and qualitative research to identify consumers' information needs and use concerning self-testing, and the consumers' actual follow-up behaviour based on the self-test result, and simultaneously investigates the quality of the currently available consumer information. The results of this study will be used as an input in developing consumer information on self-testing.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/453
work_keys_str_mv AT devriesnannek improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT ickenrothmartinehp improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT grispenjanaicaej improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT dinantgeertjan improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT rondagaby improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT vanderweijdentrudy improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
_version_ 1725316541744939008