Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review

BackgroundReal-world evidence (RWE) refers to observational health care data beyond clinical trial data. It holds the promise of transforming health care as a new form of evidence to support decision makers in making decisions when developing and regulating medicines. As the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lam, Ching, van Velthoven, Michelle Helena, Chaudhury, Hassan, Meinert, Edward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-01-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:http://www.researchprotocols.org/2020/1/e16941/
id doaj-55c1becbdc964b43b29fa531db119c02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55c1becbdc964b43b29fa531db119c022021-05-03T04:37:34ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482020-01-0191e1694110.2196/16941Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic ReviewLam, Chingvan Velthoven, Michelle HelenaChaudhury, HassanMeinert, Edward BackgroundReal-world evidence (RWE) refers to observational health care data beyond clinical trial data. It holds the promise of transforming health care as a new form of evidence to support decision makers in making decisions when developing and regulating medicines. As the importance of RWE is recognized by industry and regulatory bodies, teaching RWE becomes an important matter to evaluate and refine in order to develop future researchers and stakeholders who can better integrate RWE into the routine development of medicine. ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to understand how RWE is currently being taught. From this landscape study, the insufficiencies of the current education of RWE can be identified and subsequently inform future education policies around RWE and its subfacets. MethodsWe will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Cochrane, and Web of Science for published studies using a combination of keywords and subject headings related to RWE and education. In addition, a Google search to identify grey literature will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search and accept or reject the studies according to the study inclusion criteria; any discrepancies will be discussed and resolved. The quality of the included literature will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme systematic review checklist. ResultsData from eligible publications will be abstracted into a predesigned form in order to better understand the current state of education of RWE and inform future RWE education directions and policies. ConclusionsThe subsequent systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/16941http://www.researchprotocols.org/2020/1/e16941/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lam, Ching
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Chaudhury, Hassan
Meinert, Edward
spellingShingle Lam, Ching
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Chaudhury, Hassan
Meinert, Edward
Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
JMIR Research Protocols
author_facet Lam, Ching
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Chaudhury, Hassan
Meinert, Edward
author_sort Lam, Ching
title Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_short Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_sort teaching real-world evidence: protocol for a systematic review
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Research Protocols
issn 1929-0748
publishDate 2020-01-01
description BackgroundReal-world evidence (RWE) refers to observational health care data beyond clinical trial data. It holds the promise of transforming health care as a new form of evidence to support decision makers in making decisions when developing and regulating medicines. As the importance of RWE is recognized by industry and regulatory bodies, teaching RWE becomes an important matter to evaluate and refine in order to develop future researchers and stakeholders who can better integrate RWE into the routine development of medicine. ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to understand how RWE is currently being taught. From this landscape study, the insufficiencies of the current education of RWE can be identified and subsequently inform future education policies around RWE and its subfacets. MethodsWe will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Cochrane, and Web of Science for published studies using a combination of keywords and subject headings related to RWE and education. In addition, a Google search to identify grey literature will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search and accept or reject the studies according to the study inclusion criteria; any discrepancies will be discussed and resolved. The quality of the included literature will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme systematic review checklist. ResultsData from eligible publications will be abstracted into a predesigned form in order to better understand the current state of education of RWE and inform future RWE education directions and policies. ConclusionsThe subsequent systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/16941
url http://www.researchprotocols.org/2020/1/e16941/
work_keys_str_mv AT lamching teachingrealworldevidenceprotocolforasystematicreview
AT vanvelthovenmichellehelena teachingrealworldevidenceprotocolforasystematicreview
AT chaudhuryhassan teachingrealworldevidenceprotocolforasystematicreview
AT meinertedward teachingrealworldevidenceprotocolforasystematicreview
_version_ 1721483753616834560