Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy
In a priori analogies, the analogue is constructed in imagination, sharing certain properties with the primary subject. The analogue has some further property clearly consequent on those shared properties. Ceteris paribus the primary subject has that property also. The warrant involves non-empirical...
Main Author: | James B. Freeman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2013-05-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3893 |
Similar Items
-
Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy
by: James B. Freeman
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Govier's The Philosophy of Argument
by: James B. Freeman
Published: (2001-01-01) -
Govier's "Invention" of the Theory of Argument
by: Ralph H. Johnson
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Govier's "Invention" of the Theory of Argument
by: Ralph H. Johnson
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy
by: Derek Allen
Published: (2013-05-01)