Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse

This study is about expressing spatial relationships between Figure and Ground in Finnish Sign Language discourse and shows that the variation in this expression is primarily discourse dependent. The main findings are, first, that Ground mainly precedes Figure whether the Figure is new or a known re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Weerdt Danny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-12-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0041
id doaj-559f902db8a44c5e8d7bda89174e697a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-559f902db8a44c5e8d7bda89174e697a2021-10-02T19:26:30ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692020-12-016172374610.1515/opli-2020-0041Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language DiscourseDe Weerdt Danny0Department of Language and Communication Studies, Sign Language Centre, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 40014, FinlandThis study is about expressing spatial relationships between Figure and Ground in Finnish Sign Language discourse and shows that the variation in this expression is primarily discourse dependent. The main findings are, first, that Ground mainly precedes Figure whether the Figure is new or a known referent within the discourse; the reverse order is possible only when the Figure is known. Second, the lexical sign olla (‘have’) appears more frequently in expressing spatial relationships with a new Figure and less frequently with a known Figure but never in a construction with Figure preceding Ground; the form oli (‘had’), referring to the past, appears only in Figure preceding Ground constructions when Figure is known. Finally, the main way to express the spatial relationship between Ground and Figure is either the simultaneous production of the units, or Ground and an adposition sign. A sequential strategy is another way of expressing spatial relationships but this can be used only when the Figure is new within the discourse. The choice of strategy can be attributed to the emphasis put on the Figure’s presence when it is new while with a known Figure, the emphasis is on the location of that Figure.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0041spatial relationshipsfiguregrounddiscoursefinnish sign languagesimultaneitysequentiality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author De Weerdt Danny
spellingShingle De Weerdt Danny
Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
Open Linguistics
spatial relationships
figure
ground
discourse
finnish sign language
simultaneity
sequentiality
author_facet De Weerdt Danny
author_sort De Weerdt Danny
title Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
title_short Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
title_full Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
title_fullStr Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Figure–Ground Spatial Relationships in Finnish Sign Language Discourse
title_sort figure–ground spatial relationships in finnish sign language discourse
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This study is about expressing spatial relationships between Figure and Ground in Finnish Sign Language discourse and shows that the variation in this expression is primarily discourse dependent. The main findings are, first, that Ground mainly precedes Figure whether the Figure is new or a known referent within the discourse; the reverse order is possible only when the Figure is known. Second, the lexical sign olla (‘have’) appears more frequently in expressing spatial relationships with a new Figure and less frequently with a known Figure but never in a construction with Figure preceding Ground; the form oli (‘had’), referring to the past, appears only in Figure preceding Ground constructions when Figure is known. Finally, the main way to express the spatial relationship between Ground and Figure is either the simultaneous production of the units, or Ground and an adposition sign. A sequential strategy is another way of expressing spatial relationships but this can be used only when the Figure is new within the discourse. The choice of strategy can be attributed to the emphasis put on the Figure’s presence when it is new while with a known Figure, the emphasis is on the location of that Figure.
topic spatial relationships
figure
ground
discourse
finnish sign language
simultaneity
sequentiality
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0041
work_keys_str_mv AT deweerdtdanny figuregroundspatialrelationshipsinfinnishsignlanguagediscourse
_version_ 1716846767869263872