Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter?
Abstract Background Large scale public investment in Public Distribution System (PDS) have aimed to reduce poverty and malnutrition in India. The PDS is the largest ever welfare programme which provides subsidised food grain to the poor households. This study attempt to examine the extent of stuntin...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Nutrition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40795-020-00369-0 |
id |
doaj-559d3851490f4854a352f556a223a3ad |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-559d3851490f4854a352f556a223a3ad2020-11-25T03:17:33ZengBMCBMC Nutrition2055-09282020-10-016111410.1186/s40795-020-00369-0Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter?Basant Kumar Panda0Sanjay K. Mohanty1Itishree Nayak2Vishal Dev Shastri3S. V. Subramanian4International Institute for Population SciencesDepartment of fertility studies, International Institute for Population SciencesInternational Institute for Population SciencesSenior Advisor, FHI Solutions LLC, Alive & ThriveHarvard Centre for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthAbstract Background Large scale public investment in Public Distribution System (PDS) have aimed to reduce poverty and malnutrition in India. The PDS is the largest ever welfare programme which provides subsidised food grain to the poor households. This study attempt to examine the extent of stunting and underweight among the children from poor and non-poor households by use of public distribution system (PDS) in India. Methods Data from the National Family and Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4), was used for the analysis. A composite variable based on asset deprivation and possession of welfare card provided under PDS (BPL card), was computed for all households and categorised into four mutually exclusive groups, namely real poor, excluded poor, privileged non-poor and non-poor. Real poor are those economically poor and have a welfare card, excluded poor are those economically poor and do not have welfare card, privileged poor are those economically non-poor but have welfare card, and non-poor are those who are not economically poor and do not have welfare card. Estimates of stunting and underweight were provided by these four categories. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for the analysis. Results About half of the children from each real poor and excluded poor, two-fifths among privileged non-poor and less than one-third among non-poor households were stunted in India. Controlling for socio-economic and demographic covariates, the adjusted odds ratio of being stunted among real poor was 1.42 [95% CI: 1.38, 1.46], 1.43 [95% CI: 1.39, 1.47], among excluded poor and 1.15 [95% CI: 1.12, 1.18], among privileged non-poor. The pattern was similar for underweight and held true in most of the states of India. Conclusions Undernutrition among children from poor households those excluded from PDS is highest, and it warrants inclusion in PDS. Improving the quality of food grains and widening food basket in PDS is recommended for reduction in level of malnutrition in India.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40795-020-00369-0PoorUnderweightStuntingBPLPDSIndia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Basant Kumar Panda Sanjay K. Mohanty Itishree Nayak Vishal Dev Shastri S. V. Subramanian |
spellingShingle |
Basant Kumar Panda Sanjay K. Mohanty Itishree Nayak Vishal Dev Shastri S. V. Subramanian Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? BMC Nutrition Poor Underweight Stunting BPL PDS India |
author_facet |
Basant Kumar Panda Sanjay K. Mohanty Itishree Nayak Vishal Dev Shastri S. V. Subramanian |
author_sort |
Basant Kumar Panda |
title |
Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
title_short |
Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
title_full |
Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
title_fullStr |
Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
title_sort |
malnutrition and poverty in india: does the use of public distribution system matter? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Nutrition |
issn |
2055-0928 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Large scale public investment in Public Distribution System (PDS) have aimed to reduce poverty and malnutrition in India. The PDS is the largest ever welfare programme which provides subsidised food grain to the poor households. This study attempt to examine the extent of stunting and underweight among the children from poor and non-poor households by use of public distribution system (PDS) in India. Methods Data from the National Family and Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4), was used for the analysis. A composite variable based on asset deprivation and possession of welfare card provided under PDS (BPL card), was computed for all households and categorised into four mutually exclusive groups, namely real poor, excluded poor, privileged non-poor and non-poor. Real poor are those economically poor and have a welfare card, excluded poor are those economically poor and do not have welfare card, privileged poor are those economically non-poor but have welfare card, and non-poor are those who are not economically poor and do not have welfare card. Estimates of stunting and underweight were provided by these four categories. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for the analysis. Results About half of the children from each real poor and excluded poor, two-fifths among privileged non-poor and less than one-third among non-poor households were stunted in India. Controlling for socio-economic and demographic covariates, the adjusted odds ratio of being stunted among real poor was 1.42 [95% CI: 1.38, 1.46], 1.43 [95% CI: 1.39, 1.47], among excluded poor and 1.15 [95% CI: 1.12, 1.18], among privileged non-poor. The pattern was similar for underweight and held true in most of the states of India. Conclusions Undernutrition among children from poor households those excluded from PDS is highest, and it warrants inclusion in PDS. Improving the quality of food grains and widening food basket in PDS is recommended for reduction in level of malnutrition in India. |
topic |
Poor Underweight Stunting BPL PDS India |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40795-020-00369-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT basantkumarpanda malnutritionandpovertyinindiadoestheuseofpublicdistributionsystemmatter AT sanjaykmohanty malnutritionandpovertyinindiadoestheuseofpublicdistributionsystemmatter AT itishreenayak malnutritionandpovertyinindiadoestheuseofpublicdistributionsystemmatter AT vishaldevshastri malnutritionandpovertyinindiadoestheuseofpublicdistributionsystemmatter AT svsubramanian malnutritionandpovertyinindiadoestheuseofpublicdistributionsystemmatter |
_version_ |
1724631472305864704 |