Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers

Debates about the diversity of the judiciary in the UK have been dominated by gender, race and ethnicity. Sexuality is notable by its absence and is perceived to pose particular challenges. It is usually missing from the list of diversity categories. When present, its appearance is nominal. One effe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leslie J. Moran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-12-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
gay
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/4/512
id doaj-5595aba4e1aa4ec29de496db445e6c74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5595aba4e1aa4ec29de496db445e6c742020-11-24T22:52:26ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2013-12-012451253810.3390/laws2040512laws2040512Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial CareersLeslie J. Moran0School of Law, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UKDebates about the diversity of the judiciary in the UK have been dominated by gender, race and ethnicity. Sexuality is notable by its absence and is perceived to pose particular challenges. It is usually missing from the list of diversity categories. When present, its appearance is nominal. One effect of this has been a total lack of official data on the sexual composition of the judiciary. Another is the gap in research on the barriers to the goal of a more sexually diverse judiciary. In 2008 the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC) for England and Wales undertook research to better understand the challenges limiting progress towards judicial diversity. A central gaol of the project was to investigate barriers to application for judicial appointment across different groups defined by “sex, ethnicity and employment status”. Sexual orientation was again noticeable by its absence. Its absence was yet another missed opportunity to recognise and take seriously this strand of diversity. This study is based on a response to that absence. A stakeholder organisation, InterLaw Diversity Forum for lesbian gay bisexual and transgender networks in the legal services sector, with the JAC’s approval, used their questionnaire and for the first time asked lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers about the perceptions and experiences of barriers to judicial appointment. This paper examines the findings of that unique research and considers them in the light of the initial research on barriers to judicial appointment and subsequent developments.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/4/512Judiciaryjudicial diversityjudicial careerjudicial appointmentsexual orientationlesbiangaysexual diversityJudicial Appointments Commission
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leslie J. Moran
spellingShingle Leslie J. Moran
Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
Laws
Judiciary
judicial diversity
judicial career
judicial appointment
sexual orientation
lesbian
gay
sexual diversity
Judicial Appointments Commission
author_facet Leslie J. Moran
author_sort Leslie J. Moran
title Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
title_short Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
title_full Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
title_fullStr Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
title_full_unstemmed Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
title_sort sexual diversity in the judiciary in england and wales; research on barriers to judicial careers
publisher MDPI AG
series Laws
issn 2075-471X
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Debates about the diversity of the judiciary in the UK have been dominated by gender, race and ethnicity. Sexuality is notable by its absence and is perceived to pose particular challenges. It is usually missing from the list of diversity categories. When present, its appearance is nominal. One effect of this has been a total lack of official data on the sexual composition of the judiciary. Another is the gap in research on the barriers to the goal of a more sexually diverse judiciary. In 2008 the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC) for England and Wales undertook research to better understand the challenges limiting progress towards judicial diversity. A central gaol of the project was to investigate barriers to application for judicial appointment across different groups defined by “sex, ethnicity and employment status”. Sexual orientation was again noticeable by its absence. Its absence was yet another missed opportunity to recognise and take seriously this strand of diversity. This study is based on a response to that absence. A stakeholder organisation, InterLaw Diversity Forum for lesbian gay bisexual and transgender networks in the legal services sector, with the JAC’s approval, used their questionnaire and for the first time asked lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers about the perceptions and experiences of barriers to judicial appointment. This paper examines the findings of that unique research and considers them in the light of the initial research on barriers to judicial appointment and subsequent developments.
topic Judiciary
judicial diversity
judicial career
judicial appointment
sexual orientation
lesbian
gay
sexual diversity
Judicial Appointments Commission
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/2/4/512
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliejmoran sexualdiversityinthejudiciaryinenglandandwalesresearchonbarrierstojudicialcareers
_version_ 1725666185664528384