Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure

Background: Diet is a modifiable behavior of interest in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, measures of diet in persons with MS have not been vetted for feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Methods: This cross-sectional study examined the Automated Self-Administered 24-H (ASA24) Dietary Assessme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie L. Silveira, Brenda Jeng, Barbara A. Gower, Robert W. Motl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/4/1198
id doaj-558b855fc0974f93b8f01a72bfa3a5fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-558b855fc0974f93b8f01a72bfa3a5fc2021-04-05T23:01:10ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-04-01131198119810.3390/nu13041198Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy ExpenditureStephanie L. Silveira0Brenda Jeng1Barbara A. Gower2Robert W. Motl3Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3810 Ridgeway Drive, Birmingham, AL 35209, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3810 Ridgeway Drive, Birmingham, AL 35209, USADepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1675 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35233, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3810 Ridgeway Drive, Birmingham, AL 35209, USABackground: Diet is a modifiable behavior of interest in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, measures of diet in persons with MS have not been vetted for feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Methods: This cross-sectional study examined the Automated Self-Administered 24-H (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool in 30 persons with MS and 15 healthy control (HC) participants. Participants were prompted to complete six ASA24 recalls and undergo a standard doubly labeled water (DLW) protocol. Acceptability of ASA24 was assessed using an online questionnaire. Total energy expenditure (TEE) from DLW was compared with ASA24-reported energy intake for assessing validity. Results: All participants completed four or more ASA24 recalls, indicating feasibility of ASA24. Regarding acceptability, the hardest part of completing the ASA24 was remembering everything eaten the previous day. Pearson correlation coefficients between DLW TEE and ASA24 kcal/day were not significant among HC (r = 0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.14) or MS (r = 0.26; <i>p</i> = 0.16) participants. The absolute mean error between DLW TEE and ASA24 among HC participants was 694.96 ± 506.25 mean kcal/day and among MS participants was 585.37 ± 529.02 mean kcal/day; this represents a mean difference of 30 and 25%, respectively. Conclusion: This study established the feasibility and acceptability of ASA24 in persons with MS and provides a foundation regarding the need for further validation research examining appropriate outcomes for supporting dietary interventions.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/4/1198multiple sclerosisdietnutritiondoubly labeled waterenergy intakeenergy expenditure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie L. Silveira
Brenda Jeng
Barbara A. Gower
Robert W. Motl
spellingShingle Stephanie L. Silveira
Brenda Jeng
Barbara A. Gower
Robert W. Motl
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
Nutrients
multiple sclerosis
diet
nutrition
doubly labeled water
energy intake
energy expenditure
author_facet Stephanie L. Silveira
Brenda Jeng
Barbara A. Gower
Robert W. Motl
author_sort Stephanie L. Silveira
title Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
title_short Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
title_full Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
title_fullStr Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity of Self-Report Dietary Assessment in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison with Doubly Labeled Water Measured Total Energy Expenditure
title_sort feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary validity of self-report dietary assessment in adults with multiple sclerosis: comparison with doubly labeled water measured total energy expenditure
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background: Diet is a modifiable behavior of interest in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, measures of diet in persons with MS have not been vetted for feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Methods: This cross-sectional study examined the Automated Self-Administered 24-H (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool in 30 persons with MS and 15 healthy control (HC) participants. Participants were prompted to complete six ASA24 recalls and undergo a standard doubly labeled water (DLW) protocol. Acceptability of ASA24 was assessed using an online questionnaire. Total energy expenditure (TEE) from DLW was compared with ASA24-reported energy intake for assessing validity. Results: All participants completed four or more ASA24 recalls, indicating feasibility of ASA24. Regarding acceptability, the hardest part of completing the ASA24 was remembering everything eaten the previous day. Pearson correlation coefficients between DLW TEE and ASA24 kcal/day were not significant among HC (r = 0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.14) or MS (r = 0.26; <i>p</i> = 0.16) participants. The absolute mean error between DLW TEE and ASA24 among HC participants was 694.96 ± 506.25 mean kcal/day and among MS participants was 585.37 ± 529.02 mean kcal/day; this represents a mean difference of 30 and 25%, respectively. Conclusion: This study established the feasibility and acceptability of ASA24 in persons with MS and provides a foundation regarding the need for further validation research examining appropriate outcomes for supporting dietary interventions.
topic multiple sclerosis
diet
nutrition
doubly labeled water
energy intake
energy expenditure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/4/1198
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanielsilveira feasibilityacceptabilityandpreliminaryvalidityofselfreportdietaryassessmentinadultswithmultiplesclerosiscomparisonwithdoublylabeledwatermeasuredtotalenergyexpenditure
AT brendajeng feasibilityacceptabilityandpreliminaryvalidityofselfreportdietaryassessmentinadultswithmultiplesclerosiscomparisonwithdoublylabeledwatermeasuredtotalenergyexpenditure
AT barbaraagower feasibilityacceptabilityandpreliminaryvalidityofselfreportdietaryassessmentinadultswithmultiplesclerosiscomparisonwithdoublylabeledwatermeasuredtotalenergyexpenditure
AT robertwmotl feasibilityacceptabilityandpreliminaryvalidityofselfreportdietaryassessmentinadultswithmultiplesclerosiscomparisonwithdoublylabeledwatermeasuredtotalenergyexpenditure
_version_ 1721538777678086144