Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern

Abstract Introduction: Numerous cephalometric analyses have been proposed to diagnose the sagittal discrepancy of the craniofacial structures. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of different skeletal analyses for the identification of sagittal skeletal pattern....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maheen Ahmed, Attiya Shaikh, Mubassar Fida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dental Press Editora
Series:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500075&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-557b9b3ba04e4e70bd7a7268ca046284
record_format Article
spelling doaj-557b9b3ba04e4e70bd7a7268ca0462842020-11-24T23:55:39ZengDental Press Editora Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2177-6709235758110.1590/2177-6709.23.5.075-081.oarS2176-94512018000500075Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal patternMaheen AhmedAttiya ShaikhMubassar FidaAbstract Introduction: Numerous cephalometric analyses have been proposed to diagnose the sagittal discrepancy of the craniofacial structures. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of different skeletal analyses for the identification of sagittal skeletal pattern. Methods: A total of 146 subjects (males = 77; females = 69; mean age = 23.6 ± 4.6 years) were included. The ANB angle, Wits appraisal, Beta angle, AB plane angle, Downs angle of convexity and W angle were used to assess the anteroposterior skeletal pattern on lateral cephalograms. The sample was classified into Class I, II and III groups as determined by the diagnostic results of majority of the parameters. The validity and reliability of the aforementioned analyses were determined using Kappa statistics, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: A substantial agreement was present between ANB angle and the diagnosis made by the final group (k = 0.802). In the Class I group, Downs angle of convexity showed the highest sensitivity (0.968), whereas ANB showed the highest PPV (0.910). In the Class II group, ANB angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.928) and PPV (0.951). In the Class III group, the ANB angle, the Wits appraisal and the Beta angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.902), whereas the Downs angle of convexity and the ANB angle showed the highest PPV (1.00). Conclusion: The ANB angle was found to be the most valid and reliable indicator in all sagittal groups. Downs angle of convexity, Wits appraisal and Beta angle may be used as valid indicators to assess the Class III sagittal pattern.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500075&lng=en&tlng=enDiagnosisCephalometryReliabilityValidity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maheen Ahmed
Attiya Shaikh
Mubassar Fida
spellingShingle Maheen Ahmed
Attiya Shaikh
Mubassar Fida
Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Diagnosis
Cephalometry
Reliability
Validity
author_facet Maheen Ahmed
Attiya Shaikh
Mubassar Fida
author_sort Maheen Ahmed
title Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
title_short Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
title_full Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
title_fullStr Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
title_sort diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern
publisher Dental Press Editora
series Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
issn 2177-6709
description Abstract Introduction: Numerous cephalometric analyses have been proposed to diagnose the sagittal discrepancy of the craniofacial structures. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of different skeletal analyses for the identification of sagittal skeletal pattern. Methods: A total of 146 subjects (males = 77; females = 69; mean age = 23.6 ± 4.6 years) were included. The ANB angle, Wits appraisal, Beta angle, AB plane angle, Downs angle of convexity and W angle were used to assess the anteroposterior skeletal pattern on lateral cephalograms. The sample was classified into Class I, II and III groups as determined by the diagnostic results of majority of the parameters. The validity and reliability of the aforementioned analyses were determined using Kappa statistics, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: A substantial agreement was present between ANB angle and the diagnosis made by the final group (k = 0.802). In the Class I group, Downs angle of convexity showed the highest sensitivity (0.968), whereas ANB showed the highest PPV (0.910). In the Class II group, ANB angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.928) and PPV (0.951). In the Class III group, the ANB angle, the Wits appraisal and the Beta angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.902), whereas the Downs angle of convexity and the ANB angle showed the highest PPV (1.00). Conclusion: The ANB angle was found to be the most valid and reliable indicator in all sagittal groups. Downs angle of convexity, Wits appraisal and Beta angle may be used as valid indicators to assess the Class III sagittal pattern.
topic Diagnosis
Cephalometry
Reliability
Validity
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500075&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT maheenahmed diagnosticvalidityofdifferentcephalometricanalysesforassessmentofthesagittalskeletalpattern
AT attiyashaikh diagnosticvalidityofdifferentcephalometricanalysesforassessmentofthesagittalskeletalpattern
AT mubassarfida diagnosticvalidityofdifferentcephalometricanalysesforassessmentofthesagittalskeletalpattern
_version_ 1725461261912637440