The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media

The subject of this publication is related to such directions of modern linguistics as critical discourse analysis, media linguistics, and text semantics. The article examines the features of the media discourse of Ukraine on the example of antonymic semantic relations that are the result of modern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Synytsia Iryna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/11/shsconf_iscsai2021_02007.pdf
id doaj-55722462073c469db7aad42efa17329d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55722462073c469db7aad42efa17329d2021-04-06T13:52:52ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242021-01-011000200710.1051/shsconf/202110002007shsconf_iscsai2021_02007The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass MediaSynytsia IrynaThe subject of this publication is related to such directions of modern linguistics as critical discourse analysis, media linguistics, and text semantics. The article examines the features of the media discourse of Ukraine on the example of antonymic semantic relations that are the result of modern discursive practice. The media discourse of modern Ukraine demonstrates the facts of the emergence and functioning of the pseudo-antonymic opposition. The research is based on economic topics articles published in Ukrainian online publications during 2019-2020. The texts of the publications are written in Ukrainian or Russian. All articles are devoted to the problem of “betrayal or victory”. The author of the article asserts that the active functioning of the Ukrainian lexemes “betrayal” and “victory” in the media discourse influenced not only the emergence of unusual oppositional relations between these lexemes. The active use of pseudo-antonyms in speech contributes to the destruction of traditional axiological values of Ukrainians and involves them in pseudo-discussions. Thus, first of all, the “power of discourse” is manifested. The author speaks about the formation of an independent discourse “betrayal or victory” in the Ukrainian media discourse. Pseudo-antonyms explode the pragmatic intentions of the sender of the message and are a means of manipulative influence on the linguistic consciousness of the recipient.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/11/shsconf_iscsai2021_02007.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Synytsia Iryna
spellingShingle Synytsia Iryna
The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Synytsia Iryna
author_sort Synytsia Iryna
title The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
title_short The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
title_full The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
title_fullStr The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
title_full_unstemmed The Discursive Opposition and the “Power of Discourse” in the Ukrainian Mass Media
title_sort discursive opposition and the “power of discourse” in the ukrainian mass media
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The subject of this publication is related to such directions of modern linguistics as critical discourse analysis, media linguistics, and text semantics. The article examines the features of the media discourse of Ukraine on the example of antonymic semantic relations that are the result of modern discursive practice. The media discourse of modern Ukraine demonstrates the facts of the emergence and functioning of the pseudo-antonymic opposition. The research is based on economic topics articles published in Ukrainian online publications during 2019-2020. The texts of the publications are written in Ukrainian or Russian. All articles are devoted to the problem of “betrayal or victory”. The author of the article asserts that the active functioning of the Ukrainian lexemes “betrayal” and “victory” in the media discourse influenced not only the emergence of unusual oppositional relations between these lexemes. The active use of pseudo-antonyms in speech contributes to the destruction of traditional axiological values of Ukrainians and involves them in pseudo-discussions. Thus, first of all, the “power of discourse” is manifested. The author speaks about the formation of an independent discourse “betrayal or victory” in the Ukrainian media discourse. Pseudo-antonyms explode the pragmatic intentions of the sender of the message and are a means of manipulative influence on the linguistic consciousness of the recipient.
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/11/shsconf_iscsai2021_02007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT synytsiairyna thediscursiveoppositionandthepowerofdiscourseintheukrainianmassmedia
AT synytsiairyna discursiveoppositionandthepowerofdiscourseintheukrainianmassmedia
_version_ 1721537799379746816