Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step

Before outlining our two approaches to incorporating legal theory into classic law subjects, some further general points are in order.First, law teachers should not expect to cover all of the material associated with a particular subject or all of the questions that could be asked about it. Just as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles Sampford, David Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/5978-legal-theory-and-legal-education-the-next-step.pdf
id doaj-556ffeb6cf4e4774abde723da1d2cc05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-556ffeb6cf4e4774abde723da1d2cc052020-11-25T02:09:26ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-2839Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next StepCharles SampfordDavid WoodBefore outlining our two approaches to incorporating legal theory into classic law subjects, some further general points are in order.First, law teachers should not expect to cover all of the material associated with a particular subject or all of the questions that could be asked about it. Just as we want students to do a fairly wide range of subjects so we want them to be confronted by a range of questions and theoretical answers to them. However, just as we do not attempt to teach every area of law in a single undergraduate law subject, so we would not attempt to pose all the theoretical questions about law nor attempt to use all the theoretical answers in a single subject. Both are tasks that can and should only be addressed by the law school as a whole rather than in individual subjects. Individual academics should ask the questions that are of interest to them and which the theory of law to which they adhere (be it a standard theory or idiosyncratic) tells them is important. This is not to say that we should all be autonomous islands in the choice of questions and theoretical answers. Some communication and cooperation between staff is necessary to ensure that students are exposed to a wide range of questions and theoretical answers to them. But this is no different from any other problem in designing the curriculum. The classic subject areas such as torts, contract, property have to be parcelled up and allocated among the staff. Not everyone can teach their favourite subjects, but the interests of a well balanced staff mean that most can teach most of those areas of law in which they are interested. As it is with the familiar division of traditional subjects, so it is with the division of theoretical elements in the curriculum.http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/5978-legal-theory-and-legal-education-the-next-step.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charles Sampford
David Wood
spellingShingle Charles Sampford
David Wood
Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
Legal Education Review
author_facet Charles Sampford
David Wood
author_sort Charles Sampford
title Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
title_short Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
title_full Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
title_fullStr Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
title_full_unstemmed Legal Theory and Legal Education - the Next Step
title_sort legal theory and legal education - the next step
publisher Bond University
series Legal Education Review
issn 1033-2839
description Before outlining our two approaches to incorporating legal theory into classic law subjects, some further general points are in order.First, law teachers should not expect to cover all of the material associated with a particular subject or all of the questions that could be asked about it. Just as we want students to do a fairly wide range of subjects so we want them to be confronted by a range of questions and theoretical answers to them. However, just as we do not attempt to teach every area of law in a single undergraduate law subject, so we would not attempt to pose all the theoretical questions about law nor attempt to use all the theoretical answers in a single subject. Both are tasks that can and should only be addressed by the law school as a whole rather than in individual subjects. Individual academics should ask the questions that are of interest to them and which the theory of law to which they adhere (be it a standard theory or idiosyncratic) tells them is important. This is not to say that we should all be autonomous islands in the choice of questions and theoretical answers. Some communication and cooperation between staff is necessary to ensure that students are exposed to a wide range of questions and theoretical answers to them. But this is no different from any other problem in designing the curriculum. The classic subject areas such as torts, contract, property have to be parcelled up and allocated among the staff. Not everyone can teach their favourite subjects, but the interests of a well balanced staff mean that most can teach most of those areas of law in which they are interested. As it is with the familiar division of traditional subjects, so it is with the division of theoretical elements in the curriculum.
url http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/5978-legal-theory-and-legal-education-the-next-step.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT charlessampford legaltheoryandlegaleducationthenextstep
AT davidwood legaltheoryandlegaleducationthenextstep
_version_ 1724923843519184896