Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science

This article tries to outline possible research topics in the field of comparative 20th century legal history between Europe and Latin-America. It seeks to examine changes both in Labour and Property law as core areas where social conceptions began to influence »liberal« private law. Focussing on an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thorsten Keiser
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2012-01-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg20_258keiser.pdf
id doaj-556dc6744c724df5ba9692c94d209e92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-556dc6744c724df5ba9692c94d209e922021-03-02T03:30:18ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172012-01-01Rg 2025827310.12946/rg20/258-273787Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal ScienceThorsten KeiserThis article tries to outline possible research topics in the field of comparative 20th century legal history between Europe and Latin-America. It seeks to examine changes both in Labour and Property law as core areas where social conceptions began to influence »liberal« private law. Focussing on an example from Mexican law in the aftermath of the revolution which took place in the first decades of the 20th century, it is argued that new conceptions in both fields were discussed using similar conceptual patterns in Europe and Latin-America. In the reaction of the jurists from both continents to the challenges of the new century lies a possibility for fruitful comparison. Conducting research in such a framework can also produce comparative results on the interplay between constitutional law and private law – especially when the focus lies on Germany and Mexico, where new constitutions at the beginning of the new century did evoke reactions in the discourses about private law. With regard to methodology it has to be observed that such research has to go far beyond the traditional pattern of »reception« of legal concepts from Europe in Latin-America, and to highlight more complex ways of transition of legal forms between the two continents.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg20_258keiser.pdfMPIeR
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thorsten Keiser
spellingShingle Thorsten Keiser
Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
MPIeR
author_facet Thorsten Keiser
author_sort Thorsten Keiser
title Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
title_short Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
title_full Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
title_fullStr Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
title_full_unstemmed Social conceptions of Property and Labour – Private Law in the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution and European Legal Science
title_sort social conceptions of property and labour – private law in the aftermath of the mexican revolution and european legal science
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article tries to outline possible research topics in the field of comparative 20th century legal history between Europe and Latin-America. It seeks to examine changes both in Labour and Property law as core areas where social conceptions began to influence »liberal« private law. Focussing on an example from Mexican law in the aftermath of the revolution which took place in the first decades of the 20th century, it is argued that new conceptions in both fields were discussed using similar conceptual patterns in Europe and Latin-America. In the reaction of the jurists from both continents to the challenges of the new century lies a possibility for fruitful comparison. Conducting research in such a framework can also produce comparative results on the interplay between constitutional law and private law – especially when the focus lies on Germany and Mexico, where new constitutions at the beginning of the new century did evoke reactions in the discourses about private law. With regard to methodology it has to be observed that such research has to go far beyond the traditional pattern of »reception« of legal concepts from Europe in Latin-America, and to highlight more complex ways of transition of legal forms between the two continents.
topic MPIeR
url http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg20_258keiser.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT thorstenkeiser socialconceptionsofpropertyandlabourprivatelawintheaftermathofthemexicanrevolutionandeuropeanlegalscience
_version_ 1724243615051415552