Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of co...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629 |
id |
doaj-5569032156e04e9fb05bffbca4bead0f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5569032156e04e9fb05bffbca4bead0f2020-12-20T00:00:53ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-12-0112106291062910.3390/su122410629Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for SustainabilityGianpaolo Abatecola0Alberto Surace1Department of Management and Law, School of Economics, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, ItalyCASD—Center for High Defense Studies, Italian Ministry of Defense, 00165 Rome, ItalyWhat is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use <i>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management</i>, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the different EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues).https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629complexity theoryengineering managementmanagementsustainabilityconceptual |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gianpaolo Abatecola Alberto Surace |
spellingShingle |
Gianpaolo Abatecola Alberto Surace Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability Sustainability complexity theory engineering management management sustainability conceptual |
author_facet |
Gianpaolo Abatecola Alberto Surace |
author_sort |
Gianpaolo Abatecola |
title |
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability |
title_short |
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability |
title_full |
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability |
title_fullStr |
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability |
title_sort |
discussing the use of complexity theory in engineering management: implications for sustainability |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use <i>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management</i>, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the different EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues). |
topic |
complexity theory engineering management management sustainability conceptual |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gianpaoloabatecola discussingtheuseofcomplexitytheoryinengineeringmanagementimplicationsforsustainability AT albertosurace discussingtheuseofcomplexitytheoryinengineeringmanagementimplicationsforsustainability |
_version_ |
1724377409034125312 |