Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability

What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gianpaolo Abatecola, Alberto Surace
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629
id doaj-5569032156e04e9fb05bffbca4bead0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5569032156e04e9fb05bffbca4bead0f2020-12-20T00:00:53ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-12-0112106291062910.3390/su122410629Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for SustainabilityGianpaolo Abatecola0Alberto Surace1Department of Management and Law, School of Economics, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, ItalyCASD—Center for High Defense Studies, Italian Ministry of Defense, 00165 Rome, ItalyWhat is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use <i>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management</i>, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the different EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues).https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629complexity theoryengineering managementmanagementsustainabilityconceptual
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gianpaolo Abatecola
Alberto Surace
spellingShingle Gianpaolo Abatecola
Alberto Surace
Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
Sustainability
complexity theory
engineering management
management
sustainability
conceptual
author_facet Gianpaolo Abatecola
Alberto Surace
author_sort Gianpaolo Abatecola
title Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
title_short Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
title_full Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
title_fullStr Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability
title_sort discussing the use of complexity theory in engineering management: implications for sustainability
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-12-01
description What is the state-of-the-art literature regarding the adoption of the complexity theory (CT) in engineering management (EM)? What implications can be derived for future research and practices concerning sustainability issues? In this conceptual article, we critically discuss the current status of complexity research in EM. In this regard, we use <i>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management</i>, because it is currently considered the leading journal in EM, and is as a reliable, heuristic proxy. From this journal, we analyze 38 representative publications on the topic published since 2000, and extrapolated through a rigorous keyword-based article search. In particular, we show that: (1) the adoption of CT has been associated with a wide range of key themes in EM, such as new product development, supply chain, and project management. (2) The adoption of CT has been witnessed in an increasing amount of publications, with a focus on conceptual modeling based on fuzzy logics, stochastic, or agent-based modeling prevailing. (3) Many key features of CT seem to be quite clearly observable in our dataset, with modeling and optimizing decision making, under uncertainty, as the dominant theme. However, only a limited number of studies appear to formally adhere to CT, to explain the different EM issues investigated. Thus, we derive various implications for EM research (concerning the research in and practice on sustainability issues).
topic complexity theory
engineering management
management
sustainability
conceptual
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10629
work_keys_str_mv AT gianpaoloabatecola discussingtheuseofcomplexitytheoryinengineeringmanagementimplicationsforsustainability
AT albertosurace discussingtheuseofcomplexitytheoryinengineeringmanagementimplicationsforsustainability
_version_ 1724377409034125312