COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION

Abstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. M. Bertolino, L. A. M. Silva, S. F. Aquino, V. A. Leão
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering 2015-03-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-55560e2eb7cd422bb710b8540ed7ea3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55560e2eb7cd422bb710b8540ed7ea3c2020-11-25T00:02:04ZengBrazilian Society of Chemical EngineeringBrazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering0104-66322015-03-01321597110.1590/0104-6632.20150321s00003158S0104-66322015000100059COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTIONS. M. BertolinoL. A. M. SilvaS. F. AquinoV. A. LeãoAbstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). Organic loading, sulfate reduction, and COD removal were the main parameters monitored during lactate and glycerol degradation. The UASB reactor with biomass recirculation showed a specific sulfate reduction rate of 0.089±0.014 g.gSSV-1.d-1 (89% reduction), whereas values twice as high were achieved in the FBR treating either lactate (0.200±0.017 g.gSSV-1.d-1) or glycerol (0.178±0.010 g.gSSV-1.d-1). Sulfate reduction with pure glycerol produced a smaller residual COD (1700 mg.L-1) than that produced with lactate (2500 mg.L-1) at the same COD.sulfate-1 mass ratio. It was estimated that 50% of glycerol degradation was due to sulfate reduction and 50% to fermentation, which was supported by the presence of butyrate in the FBR effluent. The UASB reactor was unable to produce effluents with sulfate concentrations below 250 mg.L-1 due to poor mixing conditions, whereas the FBR consistently ensured residual sulfate concentrations below such a value.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=enSulfate reductionAnaerobic processesFluidized bed bioreactorsGlycerolUpflow anaerobic sludge blanketWastewater treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. M. Bertolino
L. A. M. Silva
S. F. Aquino
V. A. Leão
spellingShingle S. M. Bertolino
L. A. M. Silva
S. F. Aquino
V. A. Leão
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Sulfate reduction
Anaerobic processes
Fluidized bed bioreactors
Glycerol
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket
Wastewater treatment
author_facet S. M. Bertolino
L. A. M. Silva
S. F. Aquino
V. A. Leão
author_sort S. M. Bertolino
title COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
title_short COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
title_full COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
title_sort comparison of uasb and fluidized-bed reactors for sulfate reduction
publisher Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
series Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
issn 0104-6632
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Abstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). Organic loading, sulfate reduction, and COD removal were the main parameters monitored during lactate and glycerol degradation. The UASB reactor with biomass recirculation showed a specific sulfate reduction rate of 0.089±0.014 g.gSSV-1.d-1 (89% reduction), whereas values twice as high were achieved in the FBR treating either lactate (0.200±0.017 g.gSSV-1.d-1) or glycerol (0.178±0.010 g.gSSV-1.d-1). Sulfate reduction with pure glycerol produced a smaller residual COD (1700 mg.L-1) than that produced with lactate (2500 mg.L-1) at the same COD.sulfate-1 mass ratio. It was estimated that 50% of glycerol degradation was due to sulfate reduction and 50% to fermentation, which was supported by the presence of butyrate in the FBR effluent. The UASB reactor was unable to produce effluents with sulfate concentrations below 250 mg.L-1 due to poor mixing conditions, whereas the FBR consistently ensured residual sulfate concentrations below such a value.
topic Sulfate reduction
Anaerobic processes
Fluidized bed bioreactors
Glycerol
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket
Wastewater treatment
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT smbertolino comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction
AT lamsilva comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction
AT sfaquino comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction
AT valeao comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction
_version_ 1725439747686400000