COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION
Abstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-55560e2eb7cd422bb710b8540ed7ea3c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-55560e2eb7cd422bb710b8540ed7ea3c2020-11-25T00:02:04ZengBrazilian Society of Chemical EngineeringBrazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering0104-66322015-03-01321597110.1590/0104-6632.20150321s00003158S0104-66322015000100059COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTIONS. M. BertolinoL. A. M. SilvaS. F. AquinoV. A. LeãoAbstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). Organic loading, sulfate reduction, and COD removal were the main parameters monitored during lactate and glycerol degradation. The UASB reactor with biomass recirculation showed a specific sulfate reduction rate of 0.089±0.014 g.gSSV-1.d-1 (89% reduction), whereas values twice as high were achieved in the FBR treating either lactate (0.200±0.017 g.gSSV-1.d-1) or glycerol (0.178±0.010 g.gSSV-1.d-1). Sulfate reduction with pure glycerol produced a smaller residual COD (1700 mg.L-1) than that produced with lactate (2500 mg.L-1) at the same COD.sulfate-1 mass ratio. It was estimated that 50% of glycerol degradation was due to sulfate reduction and 50% to fermentation, which was supported by the presence of butyrate in the FBR effluent. The UASB reactor was unable to produce effluents with sulfate concentrations below 250 mg.L-1 due to poor mixing conditions, whereas the FBR consistently ensured residual sulfate concentrations below such a value.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=enSulfate reductionAnaerobic processesFluidized bed bioreactorsGlycerolUpflow anaerobic sludge blanketWastewater treatment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. M. Bertolino L. A. M. Silva S. F. Aquino V. A. Leão |
spellingShingle |
S. M. Bertolino L. A. M. Silva S. F. Aquino V. A. Leão COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Sulfate reduction Anaerobic processes Fluidized bed bioreactors Glycerol Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket Wastewater treatment |
author_facet |
S. M. Bertolino L. A. M. Silva S. F. Aquino V. A. Leão |
author_sort |
S. M. Bertolino |
title |
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF UASB AND FLUIDIZED-BED REACTORS FOR SULFATE REDUCTION |
title_sort |
comparison of uasb and fluidized-bed reactors for sulfate reduction |
publisher |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
issn |
0104-6632 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Reactor hydrodynamics is important for sulfidogenesis because sulfate reduction bacteria (SRB) do not granulate easily. In this work, the sulfate reduction performance of two continuous anaerobic bioreactors was investigated: (i) an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and (ii) a fluidized bed reactor (FBR). Organic loading, sulfate reduction, and COD removal were the main parameters monitored during lactate and glycerol degradation. The UASB reactor with biomass recirculation showed a specific sulfate reduction rate of 0.089±0.014 g.gSSV-1.d-1 (89% reduction), whereas values twice as high were achieved in the FBR treating either lactate (0.200±0.017 g.gSSV-1.d-1) or glycerol (0.178±0.010 g.gSSV-1.d-1). Sulfate reduction with pure glycerol produced a smaller residual COD (1700 mg.L-1) than that produced with lactate (2500 mg.L-1) at the same COD.sulfate-1 mass ratio. It was estimated that 50% of glycerol degradation was due to sulfate reduction and 50% to fermentation, which was supported by the presence of butyrate in the FBR effluent. The UASB reactor was unable to produce effluents with sulfate concentrations below 250 mg.L-1 due to poor mixing conditions, whereas the FBR consistently ensured residual sulfate concentrations below such a value. |
topic |
Sulfate reduction Anaerobic processes Fluidized bed bioreactors Glycerol Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket Wastewater treatment |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322015000100059&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT smbertolino comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction AT lamsilva comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction AT sfaquino comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction AT valeao comparisonofuasbandfluidizedbedreactorsforsulfatereduction |
_version_ |
1725439747686400000 |