Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
A Positive Matrix Factorization receptor model for aerosol pollution source apportionment was fit to a synthetic dataset simulating one year of daily measurements of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprised of 39 chemical species from nine pollutant sources. A n...
Main Authors: | J. G. Hemann, G. L. Brinkman, S. J. Dutton, M. P. Hannigan, J. B. Milford, S. L. Miller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2009-01-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/497/2009/acp-9-497-2009.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Positive matrix factorization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> – eliminating the effects of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds
by: M. Xie, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01) -
Spatiotemporal variations of ambient PM10 source contributions in Beijing in 2004 using positive matrix factorization
by: T. Chen, et al.
Published: (2008-05-01) -
Uncertainty and Bias in Global to Regional Scale Assessments of Current and Future Coastal Flood Risk
by: J. Hinkel, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Identification of Contributing Factors for Driver’s Perceptual Bias of Aggressive Driving in China
by: Yongfeng Ma, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Are Fit Indices Biased in Favor of Bi-Factor Models in Cognitive Ability Research?: A Comparison of Fit in Correlated Factors, Higher-Order, and Bi-Factor Models via Monte Carlo Simulations
by: Grant B. Morgan, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01)