Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale

A Positive Matrix Factorization receptor model for aerosol pollution source apportionment was fit to a synthetic dataset simulating one year of daily measurements of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprised of 39 chemical species from nine pollutant sources. A n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. G. Hemann, G. L. Brinkman, S. J. Dutton, M. P. Hannigan, J. B. Milford, S. L. Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/497/2009/acp-9-497-2009.pdf
id doaj-5552a81028e84f03ada0d39954163c3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5552a81028e84f03ada0d39954163c3d2020-11-24T22:43:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242009-01-0192497513Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scaleJ. G. HemannG. L. BrinkmanS. J. DuttonM. P. HanniganJ. B. MilfordS. L. MillerA Positive Matrix Factorization receptor model for aerosol pollution source apportionment was fit to a synthetic dataset simulating one year of daily measurements of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprised of 39 chemical species from nine pollutant sources. A novel method was developed to estimate model fit uncertainty and bias at the daily time scale, as related to factor contributions. A circular block bootstrap is used to create replicate datasets, with the same receptor model then fit to the data. Neural networks are trained to classify factors based upon chemical profiles, as opposed to correlating contribution time series, and this classification is used to align factor orderings across the model results associated with the replicate datasets. Factor contribution uncertainty is assessed from the distribution of results associated with each factor. Comparing modeled factors with input factors used to create the synthetic data assesses bias. The results indicate that variability in factor contribution estimates does not necessarily encompass model error: contribution estimates can have small associated variability across results yet also be very biased. These findings are likely dependent on characteristics of the data. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/497/2009/acp-9-497-2009.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. G. Hemann
G. L. Brinkman
S. J. Dutton
M. P. Hannigan
J. B. Milford
S. L. Miller
spellingShingle J. G. Hemann
G. L. Brinkman
S. J. Dutton
M. P. Hannigan
J. B. Milford
S. L. Miller
Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet J. G. Hemann
G. L. Brinkman
S. J. Dutton
M. P. Hannigan
J. B. Milford
S. L. Miller
author_sort J. G. Hemann
title Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
title_short Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
title_full Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
title_fullStr Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
title_full_unstemmed Assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
title_sort assessing positive matrix factorization model fit: a new method to estimate uncertainty and bias in factor contributions at the measurement time scale
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2009-01-01
description A Positive Matrix Factorization receptor model for aerosol pollution source apportionment was fit to a synthetic dataset simulating one year of daily measurements of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, comprised of 39 chemical species from nine pollutant sources. A novel method was developed to estimate model fit uncertainty and bias at the daily time scale, as related to factor contributions. A circular block bootstrap is used to create replicate datasets, with the same receptor model then fit to the data. Neural networks are trained to classify factors based upon chemical profiles, as opposed to correlating contribution time series, and this classification is used to align factor orderings across the model results associated with the replicate datasets. Factor contribution uncertainty is assessed from the distribution of results associated with each factor. Comparing modeled factors with input factors used to create the synthetic data assesses bias. The results indicate that variability in factor contribution estimates does not necessarily encompass model error: contribution estimates can have small associated variability across results yet also be very biased. These findings are likely dependent on characteristics of the data.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/497/2009/acp-9-497-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jghemann assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
AT glbrinkman assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
AT sjdutton assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
AT mphannigan assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
AT jbmilford assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
AT slmiller assessingpositivematrixfactorizationmodelfitanewmethodtoestimateuncertaintyandbiasinfactorcontributionsatthemeasurementtimescale
_version_ 1725696972015271936