Limited Endothelial Plasticity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Revealed by Quantitative Phenotypic Comparisons to Representative Endothelial Cell Controls

• Main Authors: Jeremy A. Antonyshyn, Meghan J. McFadden, Anthony O. Gramolini, Stefan O.P. Hofer, J. Paul Santerre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
• Series: Stem Cells Translational Medicine
• Subjects: Mesenchymal stromal cells; Adult stem cells; Endothelial cells; Cell differentiation; Cell plasticity
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.18-0127

Abstract Considerable effort has been directed toward deriving endothelial cells (ECs) from adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) since 2004, when it was first suggested that ECs and adipocytes share a common progenitor. While the capacity of ASCs to express endothelial markers has been repeatedly demonstrated, none constitute conclusive evidence of an endothelial phenotype as all reported markers have been detected in other, non‐endothelial cell types. In this study, quantitative phenotypic comparisons to representative EC controls were used to determine the extent of endothelial differentiation being achieved with ASCs. ASCs were harvested from human subcutaneous abdominal white adipose tissue, and their endothelial differentiation was induced using well‐established biochemical stimuli. Reverse transcription quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction and parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry were used to quantify their expression of endothelial genes and corresponding proteins, respectively. Flow cytometry was used to quantitatively assess their uptake of acetylated low‐density lipoprotein (AcLDL). Human umbilical vein, coronary artery, and dermal microvascular ECs were used as positive controls to reflect the phenotypic heterogeneity between ECs derived from different vascular beds. Biochemically conditioned ASCs were found to upregulate their expression of endothelial genes and proteins, as well as AcLDL uptake, but their abundance remained orders of magnitude lower than that observed in the EC controls despite their global proteomic heterogeneity. The findings of this investigation demonstrate the strikingly limited extent of endothelial differentiation being achieved with ASCs using well‐established biochemical stimuli, and underscore the importance of quantitative phenotypic comparisons to representative primary cell controls in studies of differentiation. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:35–45