Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling

A key question in any environmental dispute is the nature of what is under discussion. 'Cosmopolitics' – political battles over the form of reality – are a feature of many environmental clashes. This article focuses on one such clash: during the summer of 2014, grindadráp – the iconic prac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benedict E. Singleton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2016-12-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20178
id doaj-55376faff4834dd19641440877ac2304
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55376faff4834dd19641440877ac23042020-11-24T20:53:07ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512016-12-01231264810.2458/v23i1.2017819650Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whalingBenedict E. Singleton0Örebro UniversityA key question in any environmental dispute is the nature of what is under discussion. 'Cosmopolitics' – political battles over the form of reality – are a feature of many environmental clashes. This article focuses on one such clash: during the summer of 2014, grindadráp – the iconic practice of driving pilot whales for meat – was the big news item in the Faroe Islands. More accurately, a conservation campaign by the controversial group Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS), Operation Grindstop 2014, garnered most attention. Aiming to stop or at least disrupt the 'barbaric' and 'sadistic' grindadráp, SSCS were involved in several confrontations with Faroese authorities and publicly engaged with Faroese pro-whaling advocates in several discussions that were seemingly fruitless. Based on 3 months fieldwork during the campaign, this article describes a 'political ontology' of Grindstop 2014. What emerged was a 'hybrid' born of a clash between two fundamentally dissonant systems of ordering, which structured and were reinforced by various practices, both discursive and material. Activists on both sides were engaged in a cosmopolitical struggle to decisively enact their orderings, creating alternative stories of whales, Faroese whaling, the ocean environment and modernity. The aim is to understand what happened when these orderings met. This article argues that throughout the summer these two orderings moved apart, consequently hiding the diversity of opinion and discussion within Faroese society around grindadráp. As such, alternative orderings of grindadráp were suppressed, notably those voiced by Faroese activists arguing that the practice should cease because of the high levels of toxins in pilot whale meat. Key words: Faroe Islands, whaling, political ontology, cosmopoliticshttps://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20178
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedict E. Singleton
spellingShingle Benedict E. Singleton
Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Benedict E. Singleton
author_sort Benedict E. Singleton
title Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
title_short Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
title_full Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
title_fullStr Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
title_full_unstemmed Love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering Faroese pilot whaling
title_sort love-iathan, the meat-whale and hidden people: ordering faroese pilot whaling
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2016-12-01
description A key question in any environmental dispute is the nature of what is under discussion. 'Cosmopolitics' – political battles over the form of reality – are a feature of many environmental clashes. This article focuses on one such clash: during the summer of 2014, grindadráp – the iconic practice of driving pilot whales for meat – was the big news item in the Faroe Islands. More accurately, a conservation campaign by the controversial group Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS), Operation Grindstop 2014, garnered most attention. Aiming to stop or at least disrupt the 'barbaric' and 'sadistic' grindadráp, SSCS were involved in several confrontations with Faroese authorities and publicly engaged with Faroese pro-whaling advocates in several discussions that were seemingly fruitless. Based on 3 months fieldwork during the campaign, this article describes a 'political ontology' of Grindstop 2014. What emerged was a 'hybrid' born of a clash between two fundamentally dissonant systems of ordering, which structured and were reinforced by various practices, both discursive and material. Activists on both sides were engaged in a cosmopolitical struggle to decisively enact their orderings, creating alternative stories of whales, Faroese whaling, the ocean environment and modernity. The aim is to understand what happened when these orderings met. This article argues that throughout the summer these two orderings moved apart, consequently hiding the diversity of opinion and discussion within Faroese society around grindadráp. As such, alternative orderings of grindadráp were suppressed, notably those voiced by Faroese activists arguing that the practice should cease because of the high levels of toxins in pilot whale meat. Key words: Faroe Islands, whaling, political ontology, cosmopolitics
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20178
work_keys_str_mv AT benedictesingleton loveiathanthemeatwhaleandhiddenpeopleorderingfaroesepilotwhaling
_version_ 1716798034014109696