Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy

Lightness constancy refers to the ability to estimate an object's lightness (ie, surface reflectance), regardless of variations in the light being reflected from the object—for example, when the illumination changes or the object moves. Buckley et al (1994) observed that binocular cues improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucy Jane Spencer, Paul George Lovell, Julie M Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/id236
id doaj-551c050c3408487abc08b2429767b91d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-551c050c3408487abc08b2429767b91d2020-11-25T03:16:58ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-05-01310.1068/id23610.1068_id236Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness ConstancyLucy Jane SpencerPaul George LovellJulie M HarrisLightness constancy refers to the ability to estimate an object's lightness (ie, surface reflectance), regardless of variations in the light being reflected from the object—for example, when the illumination changes or the object moves. Buckley et al (1994) observed that binocular cues improve lightness constancy. Here we explored how training improved lightness constancy under binocular, bi-ocular (identical images to each eye), and monocular viewing. Stimuli consisted of a diffusely illuminated Lambertian grey box, containing a single target: a faceted rectangular block that could be presented at a range of depths within the box. Stimuli were presented stereoscopically (to provide full binocular cues), monocularly, and bi-ocularly. In the experiment, participants were asked to select one of a number of blocks, presented below the box, that was of the same material as the target block. Four groups of participants received differing training regimes. Active training involved moving a block of fixed reflectance within the box along a user-defined path (by pressing keyboard buttons). Passive training was the same as active, except block movements were pre-recorded. One group received both active and passive training. No-training used a static presentation of blocks to indicate depth. We found that stereoscopic presentation produced the best lightness constancy. Training regimes delivered a performance difference for stereoscopic, monocular, and bi-ocular presentations, with passive and active training being equally effective. With some training regimes participants took longer to achieve their best performance.https://doi.org/10.1068/id236
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucy Jane Spencer
Paul George Lovell
Julie M Harris
spellingShingle Lucy Jane Spencer
Paul George Lovell
Julie M Harris
Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
i-Perception
author_facet Lucy Jane Spencer
Paul George Lovell
Julie M Harris
author_sort Lucy Jane Spencer
title Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
title_short Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
title_full Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
title_fullStr Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
title_full_unstemmed Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy
title_sort binocular vision, training and lightness constancy
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Lightness constancy refers to the ability to estimate an object's lightness (ie, surface reflectance), regardless of variations in the light being reflected from the object—for example, when the illumination changes or the object moves. Buckley et al (1994) observed that binocular cues improve lightness constancy. Here we explored how training improved lightness constancy under binocular, bi-ocular (identical images to each eye), and monocular viewing. Stimuli consisted of a diffusely illuminated Lambertian grey box, containing a single target: a faceted rectangular block that could be presented at a range of depths within the box. Stimuli were presented stereoscopically (to provide full binocular cues), monocularly, and bi-ocularly. In the experiment, participants were asked to select one of a number of blocks, presented below the box, that was of the same material as the target block. Four groups of participants received differing training regimes. Active training involved moving a block of fixed reflectance within the box along a user-defined path (by pressing keyboard buttons). Passive training was the same as active, except block movements were pre-recorded. One group received both active and passive training. No-training used a static presentation of blocks to indicate depth. We found that stereoscopic presentation produced the best lightness constancy. Training regimes delivered a performance difference for stereoscopic, monocular, and bi-ocular presentations, with passive and active training being equally effective. With some training regimes participants took longer to achieve their best performance.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/id236
work_keys_str_mv AT lucyjanespencer binocularvisiontrainingandlightnessconstancy
AT paulgeorgelovell binocularvisiontrainingandlightnessconstancy
AT juliemharris binocularvisiontrainingandlightnessconstancy
_version_ 1724633809024974848