The impact of coping style on gaze duration.

The understanding of individual differences in response to threat (e.g., attentional bias) is important to better understand the development of anxiety disorders. Previous studies revealed only a small attentional bias in high-anxious (HA) subjects. One explanation for this finding may be the assump...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Klucken, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Astros Chatziastros, Sabine Kagerer, Petra Netter, Juergen Hennig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2981569?pdf=render
id doaj-550407637ebf43b6805e1ae6ad8a81d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-550407637ebf43b6805e1ae6ad8a81d42020-11-24T22:04:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-01511e1539510.1371/journal.pone.0015395The impact of coping style on gaze duration.Tim KluckenAnne-Marie BrouwerAstros ChatziastrosSabine KagererPetra NetterJuergen HennigThe understanding of individual differences in response to threat (e.g., attentional bias) is important to better understand the development of anxiety disorders. Previous studies revealed only a small attentional bias in high-anxious (HA) subjects. One explanation for this finding may be the assumption that all HA-subjects show a constant attentional bias. Current models distinguish HA-subjects depending on their level of tolerance for uncertainty and for arousal. These models assume that only HA-subjects with intolerance for uncertainty but tolerance for arousal ("sensitizers") show an attentional bias, compared to HA-subjects with intolerance for uncertainty and intolerance for arousal ("fluctuating subjects"). Further, it is assumed that repressors (defined as intolerance for arousal but tolerance for uncertainty) would react with avoidance behavior when confronted with threatening stimuli. The present study investigated the influence of coping styles on attentional bias. After an extensive recruiting phase, 36 subjects were classified into three groups (sensitizers, fluctuating, and repressors). All subjects were exposed to presentations of happy and threatening faces, while recording gaze durations with an eye-tracker. The results showed that only sensitizer showed an attentional bias: they gazed longer at the threatening face rather than at the happy face during the first 500 ms. The results support the findings of the relationship between anxiety and attention and extend these by showing variations according to coping styles. The differentiation of subjects according to a multifaceted coping style allows a better prediction of the attentional bias and contributes to an insight into the complex interplay of personality, coping, and behavior.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2981569?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim Klucken
Anne-Marie Brouwer
Astros Chatziastros
Sabine Kagerer
Petra Netter
Juergen Hennig
spellingShingle Tim Klucken
Anne-Marie Brouwer
Astros Chatziastros
Sabine Kagerer
Petra Netter
Juergen Hennig
The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Tim Klucken
Anne-Marie Brouwer
Astros Chatziastros
Sabine Kagerer
Petra Netter
Juergen Hennig
author_sort Tim Klucken
title The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
title_short The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
title_full The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
title_fullStr The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of coping style on gaze duration.
title_sort impact of coping style on gaze duration.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description The understanding of individual differences in response to threat (e.g., attentional bias) is important to better understand the development of anxiety disorders. Previous studies revealed only a small attentional bias in high-anxious (HA) subjects. One explanation for this finding may be the assumption that all HA-subjects show a constant attentional bias. Current models distinguish HA-subjects depending on their level of tolerance for uncertainty and for arousal. These models assume that only HA-subjects with intolerance for uncertainty but tolerance for arousal ("sensitizers") show an attentional bias, compared to HA-subjects with intolerance for uncertainty and intolerance for arousal ("fluctuating subjects"). Further, it is assumed that repressors (defined as intolerance for arousal but tolerance for uncertainty) would react with avoidance behavior when confronted with threatening stimuli. The present study investigated the influence of coping styles on attentional bias. After an extensive recruiting phase, 36 subjects were classified into three groups (sensitizers, fluctuating, and repressors). All subjects were exposed to presentations of happy and threatening faces, while recording gaze durations with an eye-tracker. The results showed that only sensitizer showed an attentional bias: they gazed longer at the threatening face rather than at the happy face during the first 500 ms. The results support the findings of the relationship between anxiety and attention and extend these by showing variations according to coping styles. The differentiation of subjects according to a multifaceted coping style allows a better prediction of the attentional bias and contributes to an insight into the complex interplay of personality, coping, and behavior.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2981569?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT timklucken theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT annemariebrouwer theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT astroschatziastros theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT sabinekagerer theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT petranetter theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT juergenhennig theimpactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT timklucken impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT annemariebrouwer impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT astroschatziastros impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT sabinekagerer impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT petranetter impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
AT juergenhennig impactofcopingstyleongazeduration
_version_ 1725827883641864192