The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute

The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad del Rosario 2014-03-01
Series:Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861
id doaj-54ff73d5ffdd426589fea477a2b0f6e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54ff73d5ffdd426589fea477a2b0f6e32020-11-24T22:32:24ZspaUniversidad del RosarioAnuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal2346-31202014-03-0110861042151The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome StatuteMiren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga0Doctoranda en el Departamento de Derecho Público, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián. Miembro de GICCAS/ Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Criminales, Instituto Vasco de Criminología/Kriminologiaren Euskal Institutua IVAC/KREI, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián.The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine, using a subjective criterion approach. In this article we will first analyze the problems raised by that case law of the ad hoc tribunals, and then, we will study the article of the Rome Statute which apparently most resembles the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine: article 25 (3) (d). The article concludes that none of the three categories of that doctrine is included in the said provision.http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861Corte Penal Internacionalmodos de intervención criminal punibleArtículo 25 (3) (d) ERempresa criminal conjuntateoría del dominio del hecho
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga
spellingShingle Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal
Corte Penal Internacional
modos de intervención criminal punible
Artículo 25 (3) (d) ER
empresa criminal conjunta
teoría del dominio del hecho
author_facet Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga
author_sort Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga
title The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
title_short The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
title_full The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
title_fullStr The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
title_full_unstemmed The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
title_sort doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the rome statute
publisher Universidad del Rosario
series Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal
issn 2346-3120
publishDate 2014-03-01
description The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine, using a subjective criterion approach. In this article we will first analyze the problems raised by that case law of the ad hoc tribunals, and then, we will study the article of the Rome Statute which apparently most resembles the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine: article 25 (3) (d). The article concludes that none of the three categories of that doctrine is included in the said provision.
topic Corte Penal Internacional
modos de intervención criminal punible
Artículo 25 (3) (d) ER
empresa criminal conjunta
teoría del dominio del hecho
url http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861
work_keys_str_mv AT mirenodriozolagurrutxaga thedoctrineofjointcriminalactionintheadhoctribunalsanditsscopeintheromestatute
AT mirenodriozolagurrutxaga doctrineofjointcriminalactionintheadhoctribunalsanditsscopeintheromestatute
_version_ 1725734215205519360