The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute
The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad del Rosario
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861 |
id |
doaj-54ff73d5ffdd426589fea477a2b0f6e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54ff73d5ffdd426589fea477a2b0f6e32020-11-24T22:32:24ZspaUniversidad del RosarioAnuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal2346-31202014-03-0110861042151The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome StatuteMiren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga0Doctoranda en el Departamento de Derecho Público, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián. Miembro de GICCAS/ Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Criminales, Instituto Vasco de Criminología/Kriminologiaren Euskal Institutua IVAC/KREI, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián.The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine, using a subjective criterion approach. In this article we will first analyze the problems raised by that case law of the ad hoc tribunals, and then, we will study the article of the Rome Statute which apparently most resembles the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine: article 25 (3) (d). The article concludes that none of the three categories of that doctrine is included in the said provision.http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861Corte Penal Internacionalmodos de intervención criminal punibleArtículo 25 (3) (d) ERempresa criminal conjuntateoría del dominio del hecho |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga |
spellingShingle |
Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal Corte Penal Internacional modos de intervención criminal punible Artículo 25 (3) (d) ER empresa criminal conjunta teoría del dominio del hecho |
author_facet |
Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga |
author_sort |
Miren Odriozola-Gurrutxaga |
title |
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute |
title_short |
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute |
title_full |
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute |
title_fullStr |
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute |
title_full_unstemmed |
The doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the Rome Statute |
title_sort |
doctrine of joint criminal action in the ad hoc tribunals and its scope in the rome statute |
publisher |
Universidad del Rosario |
series |
Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal |
issn |
2346-3120 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
The first judgment of the International Criminal Court has confirmed that article 25 (3) of the Rome Statute adopts the theory of control of the act to distinguish between principals and accessories. On the contrary, since 2003, the ad hoc tribunals’ case law bases the notion of co-perpetration on the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine, using a subjective criterion approach. In this article we will first analyze the problems raised by that case law of the ad hoc tribunals, and then, we will study the article of the Rome Statute which apparently most resembles the Joint Criminal Enterprise doctrine: article 25 (3) (d). The article concludes that none of the three categories of that doctrine is included in the said provision. |
topic |
Corte Penal Internacional modos de intervención criminal punible Artículo 25 (3) (d) ER empresa criminal conjunta teoría del dominio del hecho |
url |
http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/anidip/article/view/2861 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mirenodriozolagurrutxaga thedoctrineofjointcriminalactionintheadhoctribunalsanditsscopeintheromestatute AT mirenodriozolagurrutxaga doctrineofjointcriminalactionintheadhoctribunalsanditsscopeintheromestatute |
_version_ |
1725734215205519360 |