On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English
This paper deals with the syntactic and semantic properties of a specific kind of anaphoric device (AD) in English, instantiated by Prn+SELF lexical items (himself/herself/itself…; ‘SELF’ henceforth), which do not behave like anaphors in the sense of Binding Theory either syntactically or semantical...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Studia Anglica Posnaniensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0005 |
id |
doaj-54d6865e8ce64f988d0f47b2119d89c4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54d6865e8ce64f988d0f47b2119d89c42021-09-05T14:02:04ZengSciendoStudia Anglica Posnaniensia0081-62722082-51022019-03-015418111210.2478/stap-2019-0005stap-2019-0005On Intensive Endophoric Devices in EnglishKrivochen Diego0Università di Verona, Viale dell’Università 4, 37129VeronaThis paper deals with the syntactic and semantic properties of a specific kind of anaphoric device (AD) in English, instantiated by Prn+SELF lexical items (himself/herself/itself…; ‘SELF’ henceforth), which do not behave like anaphors in the sense of Binding Theory either syntactically or semantically. These devices have received the name of intensives in the grammatical literature (Leskosky 1972; Siemund 2000, among many others). We will look at the syntactic behaviour of so-called intensives in different syntactic contexts, and refine the classification of these ADs taking into consideration (a) how each type of intensive is derived, (b) the kinds of syntactic rules that can affect them, and (c) their meaning.https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0005anaphorareflexivityintensivesclassic transformational grammar |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Krivochen Diego |
spellingShingle |
Krivochen Diego On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English Studia Anglica Posnaniensia anaphora reflexivity intensives classic transformational grammar |
author_facet |
Krivochen Diego |
author_sort |
Krivochen Diego |
title |
On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English |
title_short |
On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English |
title_full |
On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English |
title_fullStr |
On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English |
title_sort |
on intensive endophoric devices in english |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia |
issn |
0081-6272 2082-5102 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
This paper deals with the syntactic and semantic properties of a specific kind of anaphoric device (AD) in English, instantiated by Prn+SELF lexical items (himself/herself/itself…; ‘SELF’ henceforth), which do not behave like anaphors in the sense of Binding Theory either syntactically or semantically. These devices have received the name of intensives in the grammatical literature (Leskosky 1972; Siemund 2000, among many others). We will look at the syntactic behaviour of so-called intensives in different syntactic contexts, and refine the classification of these ADs taking into consideration (a) how each type of intensive is derived, (b) the kinds of syntactic rules that can affect them, and (c) their meaning. |
topic |
anaphora reflexivity intensives classic transformational grammar |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0005 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT krivochendiego onintensiveendophoricdevicesinenglish |
_version_ |
1717809116173303808 |