Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
School-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adoles...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Children |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231 |
id |
doaj-54d32f12c0574a3aa3e22a4df61893f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54d32f12c0574a3aa3e22a4df61893f12021-04-02T18:01:37ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672020-11-01723123110.3390/children7110231Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process EvaluationStephanie T. Jong0Caroline H. D. Croxson1Campbell Foubister2Helen Elizabeth Brown3Cornelia Guell4Emma R. Lawlor5Emma K. Wells6Paul O. Wilkinson7Edward C. F. Wilson8Esther M. F. van Sluijs9Kirsten Corder10UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3HD, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UKHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKSchool-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adolescent PA. A mixed-methods process evaluation was embedded to facilitate greater understanding of the results, to elicit subgroup perceptions, and to provide insight into contextual factors influencing intervention implementation. This paper presents the reach, recruitment, dose, and fidelity of GoActive, and identifies challenges to implementation. The process evaluation employed questionnaires (1543 Year 9s), individual interviews (16 Year 9s; 7 facilitators; 9 contact teachers), focus groups (48 Year 9s; 58 mentors), alongside GoActive website analytics and researcher observations. GoActive sessions reached 39.4% of Year 9s. Intervention satisfaction was relatively high for mentors (87.3%) and facilitators (85.7%), but lower for Year 9s (59.5%) and teachers (50%). Intervention fidelity was mixed within and between schools. Mentorship was the most implemented component. Factors potentially contributing to low implementation included ambiguity of the roles subgroups played within intervention delivery, Year 9 engagement, institutional support, and further school-level constraints. Multiple challenges and varying contextual considerations hindered the implementation of GoActive in multiple school sites. Methods to overcome contextual challenges to implementation warrant in-depth consideration and innovative approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231school-based interventionprocess evaluationfidelitymixed-methodsphysical activity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephanie T. Jong Caroline H. D. Croxson Campbell Foubister Helen Elizabeth Brown Cornelia Guell Emma R. Lawlor Emma K. Wells Paul O. Wilkinson Edward C. F. Wilson Esther M. F. van Sluijs Kirsten Corder |
spellingShingle |
Stephanie T. Jong Caroline H. D. Croxson Campbell Foubister Helen Elizabeth Brown Cornelia Guell Emma R. Lawlor Emma K. Wells Paul O. Wilkinson Edward C. F. Wilson Esther M. F. van Sluijs Kirsten Corder Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Children school-based intervention process evaluation fidelity mixed-methods physical activity |
author_facet |
Stephanie T. Jong Caroline H. D. Croxson Campbell Foubister Helen Elizabeth Brown Cornelia Guell Emma R. Lawlor Emma K. Wells Paul O. Wilkinson Edward C. F. Wilson Esther M. F. van Sluijs Kirsten Corder |
author_sort |
Stephanie T. Jong |
title |
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_short |
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full |
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_sort |
reach, recruitment, dose, and intervention fidelity of the goactive school-based physical activity intervention in the uk: a mixed-methods process evaluation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Children |
issn |
2227-9067 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
School-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adolescent PA. A mixed-methods process evaluation was embedded to facilitate greater understanding of the results, to elicit subgroup perceptions, and to provide insight into contextual factors influencing intervention implementation. This paper presents the reach, recruitment, dose, and fidelity of GoActive, and identifies challenges to implementation. The process evaluation employed questionnaires (1543 Year 9s), individual interviews (16 Year 9s; 7 facilitators; 9 contact teachers), focus groups (48 Year 9s; 58 mentors), alongside GoActive website analytics and researcher observations. GoActive sessions reached 39.4% of Year 9s. Intervention satisfaction was relatively high for mentors (87.3%) and facilitators (85.7%), but lower for Year 9s (59.5%) and teachers (50%). Intervention fidelity was mixed within and between schools. Mentorship was the most implemented component. Factors potentially contributing to low implementation included ambiguity of the roles subgroups played within intervention delivery, Year 9 engagement, institutional support, and further school-level constraints. Multiple challenges and varying contextual considerations hindered the implementation of GoActive in multiple school sites. Methods to overcome contextual challenges to implementation warrant in-depth consideration and innovative approaches. |
topic |
school-based intervention process evaluation fidelity mixed-methods physical activity |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephanietjong reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT carolinehdcroxson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT campbellfoubister reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT helenelizabethbrown reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT corneliaguell reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT emmarlawlor reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT emmakwells reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT paulowilkinson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT edwardcfwilson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT esthermfvansluijs reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT kirstencorder reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation |
_version_ |
1721552751081553920 |