Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation

School-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adoles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie T. Jong, Caroline H. D. Croxson, Campbell Foubister, Helen Elizabeth Brown, Cornelia Guell, Emma R. Lawlor, Emma K. Wells, Paul O. Wilkinson, Edward C. F. Wilson, Esther M. F. van Sluijs, Kirsten Corder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231
id doaj-54d32f12c0574a3aa3e22a4df61893f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54d32f12c0574a3aa3e22a4df61893f12021-04-02T18:01:37ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672020-11-01723123110.3390/children7110231Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process EvaluationStephanie T. Jong0Caroline H. D. Croxson1Campbell Foubister2Helen Elizabeth Brown3Cornelia Guell4Emma R. Lawlor5Emma K. Wells6Paul O. Wilkinson7Edward C. F. Wilson8Esther M. F. van Sluijs9Kirsten Corder10UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3HD, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UKHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR) and MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKSchool-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adolescent PA. A mixed-methods process evaluation was embedded to facilitate greater understanding of the results, to elicit subgroup perceptions, and to provide insight into contextual factors influencing intervention implementation. This paper presents the reach, recruitment, dose, and fidelity of GoActive, and identifies challenges to implementation. The process evaluation employed questionnaires (1543 Year 9s), individual interviews (16 Year 9s; 7 facilitators; 9 contact teachers), focus groups (48 Year 9s; 58 mentors), alongside GoActive website analytics and researcher observations. GoActive sessions reached 39.4% of Year 9s. Intervention satisfaction was relatively high for mentors (87.3%) and facilitators (85.7%), but lower for Year 9s (59.5%) and teachers (50%). Intervention fidelity was mixed within and between schools. Mentorship was the most implemented component. Factors potentially contributing to low implementation included ambiguity of the roles subgroups played within intervention delivery, Year 9 engagement, institutional support, and further school-level constraints. Multiple challenges and varying contextual considerations hindered the implementation of GoActive in multiple school sites. Methods to overcome contextual challenges to implementation warrant in-depth consideration and innovative approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231school-based interventionprocess evaluationfidelitymixed-methodsphysical activity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie T. Jong
Caroline H. D. Croxson
Campbell Foubister
Helen Elizabeth Brown
Cornelia Guell
Emma R. Lawlor
Emma K. Wells
Paul O. Wilkinson
Edward C. F. Wilson
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Kirsten Corder
spellingShingle Stephanie T. Jong
Caroline H. D. Croxson
Campbell Foubister
Helen Elizabeth Brown
Cornelia Guell
Emma R. Lawlor
Emma K. Wells
Paul O. Wilkinson
Edward C. F. Wilson
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Kirsten Corder
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
Children
school-based intervention
process evaluation
fidelity
mixed-methods
physical activity
author_facet Stephanie T. Jong
Caroline H. D. Croxson
Campbell Foubister
Helen Elizabeth Brown
Cornelia Guell
Emma R. Lawlor
Emma K. Wells
Paul O. Wilkinson
Edward C. F. Wilson
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Kirsten Corder
author_sort Stephanie T. Jong
title Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
title_short Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
title_full Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
title_fullStr Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
title_sort reach, recruitment, dose, and intervention fidelity of the goactive school-based physical activity intervention in the uk: a mixed-methods process evaluation
publisher MDPI AG
series Children
issn 2227-9067
publishDate 2020-11-01
description School-based multi-component physical activity (PA) promotion is advocated; however, research has indicated that a multi-component approach may not always be effective at increasing adolescent PA. Evaluation of the GoActive 12-week multi-component school-based intervention showed no effect on adolescent PA. A mixed-methods process evaluation was embedded to facilitate greater understanding of the results, to elicit subgroup perceptions, and to provide insight into contextual factors influencing intervention implementation. This paper presents the reach, recruitment, dose, and fidelity of GoActive, and identifies challenges to implementation. The process evaluation employed questionnaires (1543 Year 9s), individual interviews (16 Year 9s; 7 facilitators; 9 contact teachers), focus groups (48 Year 9s; 58 mentors), alongside GoActive website analytics and researcher observations. GoActive sessions reached 39.4% of Year 9s. Intervention satisfaction was relatively high for mentors (87.3%) and facilitators (85.7%), but lower for Year 9s (59.5%) and teachers (50%). Intervention fidelity was mixed within and between schools. Mentorship was the most implemented component. Factors potentially contributing to low implementation included ambiguity of the roles subgroups played within intervention delivery, Year 9 engagement, institutional support, and further school-level constraints. Multiple challenges and varying contextual considerations hindered the implementation of GoActive in multiple school sites. Methods to overcome contextual challenges to implementation warrant in-depth consideration and innovative approaches.
topic school-based intervention
process evaluation
fidelity
mixed-methods
physical activity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/231
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanietjong reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT carolinehdcroxson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT campbellfoubister reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT helenelizabethbrown reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT corneliaguell reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT emmarlawlor reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT emmakwells reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT paulowilkinson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT edwardcfwilson reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT esthermfvansluijs reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT kirstencorder reachrecruitmentdoseandinterventionfidelityofthegoactiveschoolbasedphysicalactivityinterventionintheukamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
_version_ 1721552751081553920