The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
Drawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her fr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151 |
id |
doaj-54d2465888e848fc941ff6d2a7ae7671 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54d2465888e848fc941ff6d2a7ae76712020-11-25T00:58:12ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-03-0110315110.3390/rel10030151rel10030151The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal ModelYanchao Zhang0Religion Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USADrawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her from a polyvalent local object of devotion to a key deity in a national cult that strongly reflected official ideology. State canonization involved three deeply intertwined strategies to standardize, give public recognition, and promote a range of local beliefs and practices: the conferral of official titles, the incorporation of local gods and goddesses into the register of sacrifices, and the construction of official temples. As a result of these interwoven processes, Mazu became associated with domestic defense and warfare, the protection of government officials, and the involvement in political endeavors. As such, the imperial version of goddess worship served to justify and reinforce imperial authority. For all the analytical strength of the notion of imperial metaphor, I contend, however, that it needs to be supplemented with and critiqued by Robert Hymes’ “personal model,” in order to fully understand the complexity and dynamism of the Mazu devotion, and more generally, of popular religion in late imperial China.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151imperial metaphorMazu worshippersonal modelRobert Hymesstate canonizationStephan Feuchtwang |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yanchao Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Yanchao Zhang The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model Religions imperial metaphor Mazu worship personal model Robert Hymes state canonization Stephan Feuchtwang |
author_facet |
Yanchao Zhang |
author_sort |
Yanchao Zhang |
title |
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model |
title_short |
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model |
title_full |
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model |
title_fullStr |
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model |
title_sort |
state canonization of mazu: bringing the notion of imperial metaphor into conversation with the personal model |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Drawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her from a polyvalent local object of devotion to a key deity in a national cult that strongly reflected official ideology. State canonization involved three deeply intertwined strategies to standardize, give public recognition, and promote a range of local beliefs and practices: the conferral of official titles, the incorporation of local gods and goddesses into the register of sacrifices, and the construction of official temples. As a result of these interwoven processes, Mazu became associated with domestic defense and warfare, the protection of government officials, and the involvement in political endeavors. As such, the imperial version of goddess worship served to justify and reinforce imperial authority. For all the analytical strength of the notion of imperial metaphor, I contend, however, that it needs to be supplemented with and critiqued by Robert Hymes’ “personal model,” in order to fully understand the complexity and dynamism of the Mazu devotion, and more generally, of popular religion in late imperial China. |
topic |
imperial metaphor Mazu worship personal model Robert Hymes state canonization Stephan Feuchtwang |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanchaozhang thestatecanonizationofmazubringingthenotionofimperialmetaphorintoconversationwiththepersonalmodel AT yanchaozhang statecanonizationofmazubringingthenotionofimperialmetaphorintoconversationwiththepersonalmodel |
_version_ |
1725221241075269632 |