The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model

Drawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yanchao Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151
id doaj-54d2465888e848fc941ff6d2a7ae7671
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54d2465888e848fc941ff6d2a7ae76712020-11-25T00:58:12ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-03-0110315110.3390/rel10030151rel10030151The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal ModelYanchao Zhang0Religion Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USADrawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her from a polyvalent local object of devotion to a key deity in a national cult that strongly reflected official ideology. State canonization involved three deeply intertwined strategies to standardize, give public recognition, and promote a range of local beliefs and practices: the conferral of official titles, the incorporation of local gods and goddesses into the register of sacrifices, and the construction of official temples. As a result of these interwoven processes, Mazu became associated with domestic defense and warfare, the protection of government officials, and the involvement in political endeavors. As such, the imperial version of goddess worship served to justify and reinforce imperial authority. For all the analytical strength of the notion of imperial metaphor, I contend, however, that it needs to be supplemented with and critiqued by Robert Hymes’ “personal model,” in order to fully understand the complexity and dynamism of the Mazu devotion, and more generally, of popular religion in late imperial China.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151imperial metaphorMazu worshippersonal modelRobert Hymesstate canonizationStephan Feuchtwang
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yanchao Zhang
spellingShingle Yanchao Zhang
The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
Religions
imperial metaphor
Mazu worship
personal model
Robert Hymes
state canonization
Stephan Feuchtwang
author_facet Yanchao Zhang
author_sort Yanchao Zhang
title The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
title_short The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
title_full The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
title_fullStr The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
title_full_unstemmed The State Canonization of Mazu: Bringing the Notion of Imperial Metaphor into Conversation with the Personal Model
title_sort state canonization of mazu: bringing the notion of imperial metaphor into conversation with the personal model
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Drawing from Stephan Feuchtwang’s influential notion of “imperial metaphor,” this article explores the role that the state played in the development of the Mazu cult in late imperial China. I argue that the state was central in the canonization of Mazu, elevating her from a polyvalent local object of devotion to a key deity in a national cult that strongly reflected official ideology. State canonization involved three deeply intertwined strategies to standardize, give public recognition, and promote a range of local beliefs and practices: the conferral of official titles, the incorporation of local gods and goddesses into the register of sacrifices, and the construction of official temples. As a result of these interwoven processes, Mazu became associated with domestic defense and warfare, the protection of government officials, and the involvement in political endeavors. As such, the imperial version of goddess worship served to justify and reinforce imperial authority. For all the analytical strength of the notion of imperial metaphor, I contend, however, that it needs to be supplemented with and critiqued by Robert Hymes’ “personal model,” in order to fully understand the complexity and dynamism of the Mazu devotion, and more generally, of popular religion in late imperial China.
topic imperial metaphor
Mazu worship
personal model
Robert Hymes
state canonization
Stephan Feuchtwang
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/151
work_keys_str_mv AT yanchaozhang thestatecanonizationofmazubringingthenotionofimperialmetaphorintoconversationwiththepersonalmodel
AT yanchaozhang statecanonizationofmazubringingthenotionofimperialmetaphorintoconversationwiththepersonalmodel
_version_ 1725221241075269632