Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model
We use an ensemble of surface (EPA CSN, IMPROVE, SEARCH, AERONET), aircraft (SEAC<sup>4</sup>RS), and satellite (MODIS, MISR) observations over the southeast US during the summer–fall of 2013 to better understand aerosol sources in the region and the relationship between surface particul...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10411/2015/acp-15-10411-2015.pdf |
id |
doaj-54bd717420304670b47e3016b532a5e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. S. Kim D. J. Jacob J. A. Fisher K. Travis K. Yu L. Zhu R. M. Yantosca M. P. Sulprizio J. L. Jimenez P. Campuzano-Jost K. D. Froyd J. Liao J. W. Hair M. A. Fenn C. F. Butler N. L. Wagner T. D. Gordon A. Welti P. O. Wennberg J. D. Crounse J. M. St. Clair A. P. Teng D. B. Millet J. P. Schwarz M. Z. Markovic A. E. Perring |
spellingShingle |
P. S. Kim D. J. Jacob J. A. Fisher K. Travis K. Yu L. Zhu R. M. Yantosca M. P. Sulprizio J. L. Jimenez P. Campuzano-Jost K. D. Froyd J. Liao J. W. Hair M. A. Fenn C. F. Butler N. L. Wagner T. D. Gordon A. Welti P. O. Wennberg J. D. Crounse J. M. St. Clair A. P. Teng D. B. Millet J. P. Schwarz M. Z. Markovic A. E. Perring Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
P. S. Kim D. J. Jacob J. A. Fisher K. Travis K. Yu L. Zhu R. M. Yantosca M. P. Sulprizio J. L. Jimenez P. Campuzano-Jost K. D. Froyd J. Liao J. W. Hair M. A. Fenn C. F. Butler N. L. Wagner T. D. Gordon A. Welti P. O. Wennberg J. D. Crounse J. M. St. Clair A. P. Teng D. B. Millet J. P. Schwarz M. Z. Markovic A. E. Perring |
author_sort |
P. S. Kim |
title |
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model |
title_short |
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model |
title_full |
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model |
title_fullStr |
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model |
title_sort |
sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast us aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the geos-chem chemical transport model |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2015-09-01 |
description |
We use an ensemble of surface (EPA CSN, IMPROVE, SEARCH, AERONET), aircraft
(SEAC<sup>4</sup>RS), and satellite (MODIS, MISR) observations over the southeast
US during the summer–fall of 2013 to better understand aerosol sources in the
region and the relationship between surface particulate matter (PM) and
aerosol optical depth (AOD). The GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model
(CTM) with 25 × 25 km<sup>2</sup> resolution over North America is used
as a common platform to interpret measurements of different aerosol variables
made at different times and locations. Sulfate and organic aerosol (OA) are
the main contributors to surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> (mass concentration of PM finer
than 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter) and AOD over the southeast US. OA
is simulated successfully with a simple parameterization, assuming
irreversible uptake of low-volatility products of hydrocarbon oxidation.
Biogenic isoprene and monoterpenes account for 60 % of OA, anthropogenic
sources for 30 %, and open fires for 10 %. 60 % of total aerosol
mass is in the mixed layer below 1.5 km, 25 % in the cloud convective
layer at 1.5–3 km, and 15 % in the free troposphere above 3 km. This
vertical profile is well captured by GEOS-Chem, arguing against a
high-altitude source of OA. The extent of sulfate neutralization
(<i>f</i> = [NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>]/(2[SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>] + [NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>]) is only
0.5–0.7 mol mol<sup>−1</sup> in the observations, despite an excess of ammonia
present, which could reflect suppression of ammonia uptake by OA. This would
explain the long-term decline of ammonium aerosol in the southeast US,
paralleling that of sulfate. The vertical profile of aerosol extinction over
the southeast US follows closely that of aerosol mass. GEOS-Chem reproduces
observed total column aerosol mass over the southeast US within 6 %,
column aerosol extinction within 16 %, and space-based AOD within
8–28 % (consistently biased low). The large AOD decline observed from
summer to winter is driven by sharp declines in both sulfate and OA from
August to October. These declines are due to shutdowns in both biogenic
emissions and UV-driven photochemistry. Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> shows far less
summer-to-winter decrease than AOD and we attribute this in part to the
offsetting effect of weaker boundary layer ventilation. The SEAC4RS aircraft
data demonstrate that AODs measured from space are consistent with surface
PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This implies that satellites can be used reliably to infer
surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over monthly timescales if a good CTM representation of
the aerosol vertical profile is available. |
url |
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10411/2015/acp-15-10411-2015.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pskim sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT djjacob sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jafisher sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT ktravis sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT kyu sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT lzhu sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT rmyantosca sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT mpsulprizio sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jljimenez sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT pcampuzanojost sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT kdfroyd sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jliao sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jwhair sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT mafenn sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT cfbutler sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT nlwagner sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT tdgordon sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT awelti sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT powennberg sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jdcrounse sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jmstclair sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT apteng sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT dbmillet sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT jpschwarz sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT mzmarkovic sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel AT aeperring sourcesseasonalityandtrendsofsoutheastusaerosolanintegratedanalysisofsurfaceaircraftandsatelliteobservationswiththegeoschemchemicaltransportmodel |
_version_ |
1725957721746833408 |
spelling |
doaj-54bd717420304670b47e3016b532a5e62020-11-24T21:32:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242015-09-011518104111043310.5194/acp-15-10411-2015Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport modelP. S. Kim0D. J. Jacob1J. A. Fisher2K. Travis3K. Yu4L. Zhu5R. M. Yantosca6M. P. Sulprizio7J. L. Jimenez8P. Campuzano-Jost9K. D. Froyd10J. Liao11J. W. Hair12M. A. Fenn13C. F. Butler14N. L. Wagner15T. D. Gordon16A. Welti17P. O. Wennberg18J. D. Crounse19J. M. St. Clair20A. P. Teng21D. B. Millet22J. P. Schwarz23M. Z. Markovic24A. E. Perring25Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASchool of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USANASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USAScience Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USAScience Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USADivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USADivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USADivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USADivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USADepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN, USAChemical Sciences Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USAWe use an ensemble of surface (EPA CSN, IMPROVE, SEARCH, AERONET), aircraft (SEAC<sup>4</sup>RS), and satellite (MODIS, MISR) observations over the southeast US during the summer–fall of 2013 to better understand aerosol sources in the region and the relationship between surface particulate matter (PM) and aerosol optical depth (AOD). The GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model (CTM) with 25 × 25 km<sup>2</sup> resolution over North America is used as a common platform to interpret measurements of different aerosol variables made at different times and locations. Sulfate and organic aerosol (OA) are the main contributors to surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> (mass concentration of PM finer than 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter) and AOD over the southeast US. OA is simulated successfully with a simple parameterization, assuming irreversible uptake of low-volatility products of hydrocarbon oxidation. Biogenic isoprene and monoterpenes account for 60 % of OA, anthropogenic sources for 30 %, and open fires for 10 %. 60 % of total aerosol mass is in the mixed layer below 1.5 km, 25 % in the cloud convective layer at 1.5–3 km, and 15 % in the free troposphere above 3 km. This vertical profile is well captured by GEOS-Chem, arguing against a high-altitude source of OA. The extent of sulfate neutralization (<i>f</i> = [NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>]/(2[SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>] + [NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>]) is only 0.5–0.7 mol mol<sup>−1</sup> in the observations, despite an excess of ammonia present, which could reflect suppression of ammonia uptake by OA. This would explain the long-term decline of ammonium aerosol in the southeast US, paralleling that of sulfate. The vertical profile of aerosol extinction over the southeast US follows closely that of aerosol mass. GEOS-Chem reproduces observed total column aerosol mass over the southeast US within 6 %, column aerosol extinction within 16 %, and space-based AOD within 8–28 % (consistently biased low). The large AOD decline observed from summer to winter is driven by sharp declines in both sulfate and OA from August to October. These declines are due to shutdowns in both biogenic emissions and UV-driven photochemistry. Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> shows far less summer-to-winter decrease than AOD and we attribute this in part to the offsetting effect of weaker boundary layer ventilation. The SEAC4RS aircraft data demonstrate that AODs measured from space are consistent with surface PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This implies that satellites can be used reliably to infer surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> over monthly timescales if a good CTM representation of the aerosol vertical profile is available.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/10411/2015/acp-15-10411-2015.pdf |