Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zane Giffen, Austin Ezzone, Obi Ekwenna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548
id doaj-54861a5d1c8d4c9cb1871fb2a4db12ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54861a5d1c8d4c9cb1871fb2a4db12ea2021-07-22T04:30:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025354810.1371/journal.pone.0253548Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.Zane GiffenAustin EzzoneObi Ekwenna<h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA's MAUDE database for adverse events related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Results</h4>Upon review of the FDA database, the most frequently reported robotic stapler complications were malfunction, failure to form staple line, device fragmentation, and misfire. 31 Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications were attributed to stapler use since 2014.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further research on prevalence of robotic stapler use is needed to quantity the associated complication rate.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zane Giffen
Austin Ezzone
Obi Ekwenna
spellingShingle Zane Giffen
Austin Ezzone
Obi Ekwenna
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Zane Giffen
Austin Ezzone
Obi Ekwenna
author_sort Zane Giffen
title Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
title_short Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
title_full Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
title_fullStr Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
title_full_unstemmed Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
title_sort robotic stapler use: is it safe?-fda database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA's MAUDE database for adverse events related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Results</h4>Upon review of the FDA database, the most frequently reported robotic stapler complications were malfunction, failure to form staple line, device fragmentation, and misfire. 31 Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications were attributed to stapler use since 2014.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further research on prevalence of robotic stapler use is needed to quantity the associated complication rate.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548
work_keys_str_mv AT zanegiffen roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties
AT austinezzone roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties
AT obiekwenna roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties
_version_ 1721292180957429760