Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA&...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548 |
id |
doaj-54861a5d1c8d4c9cb1871fb2a4db12ea |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54861a5d1c8d4c9cb1871fb2a4db12ea2021-07-22T04:30:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025354810.1371/journal.pone.0253548Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.Zane GiffenAustin EzzoneObi Ekwenna<h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA's MAUDE database for adverse events related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Results</h4>Upon review of the FDA database, the most frequently reported robotic stapler complications were malfunction, failure to form staple line, device fragmentation, and misfire. 31 Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications were attributed to stapler use since 2014.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further research on prevalence of robotic stapler use is needed to quantity the associated complication rate.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zane Giffen Austin Ezzone Obi Ekwenna |
spellingShingle |
Zane Giffen Austin Ezzone Obi Ekwenna Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Zane Giffen Austin Ezzone Obi Ekwenna |
author_sort |
Zane Giffen |
title |
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
title_short |
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
title_full |
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
title_fullStr |
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
title_sort |
robotic stapler use: is it safe?-fda database analysis across multiple surgical specialties. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Introduction</h4>Robotic-assisted techniques are common across many surgical subspecialties. While robotic stapling offers increased surgeon control, there is limited information on surgical complications related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Methods</h4>We reviewed the FDA's MAUDE database for adverse events related to robotic stapler use.<h4>Results</h4>Upon review of the FDA database, the most frequently reported robotic stapler complications were malfunction, failure to form staple line, device fragmentation, and misfire. 31 Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications were attributed to stapler use since 2014.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further research on prevalence of robotic stapler use is needed to quantity the associated complication rate. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253548 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zanegiffen roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties AT austinezzone roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties AT obiekwenna roboticstapleruseisitsafefdadatabaseanalysisacrossmultiplesurgicalspecialties |
_version_ |
1721292180957429760 |