Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
Meaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participant...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/full |
id |
doaj-547f757870224355a93dd4ba54115058 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-547f757870224355a93dd4ba541150582021-08-10T05:42:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2021-08-01910.3389/fenvs.2021.699397699397Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of KnowledgeLeticia Antunes NogueiraMaiken BjørkanBrigt DaleMeaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participants with diverse worldviews, expertise and interests are expected to collaborate. These obstacles have not received enough attention, as current debate has focused more on the merits and principles of this approach. We address this gap by reflecting upon our experiences with both practical and methodological challenges stemming from research projects based on co-production of knowledge, thereby exposing what we see as common but under-discussed obstacles, as well as guidance for tackling them. We highlight the role of social scientists in the process not merely as facilitators but also as agents that promote critical reflection and safeguard the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of both the process and its outputs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/fullco-production of knowledgepost-normal scienceexperience-based knowledgescience–practice interfacetransdisciplinary research projectsscience technology and innovation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leticia Antunes Nogueira Maiken Bjørkan Brigt Dale |
spellingShingle |
Leticia Antunes Nogueira Maiken Bjørkan Brigt Dale Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge Frontiers in Environmental Science co-production of knowledge post-normal science experience-based knowledge science–practice interface transdisciplinary research projects science technology and innovation |
author_facet |
Leticia Antunes Nogueira Maiken Bjørkan Brigt Dale |
author_sort |
Leticia Antunes Nogueira |
title |
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge |
title_short |
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge |
title_full |
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge |
title_sort |
conducting research in a post-normal paradigm: practical guidance for applying co-production of knowledge |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Environmental Science |
issn |
2296-665X |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Meaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participants with diverse worldviews, expertise and interests are expected to collaborate. These obstacles have not received enough attention, as current debate has focused more on the merits and principles of this approach. We address this gap by reflecting upon our experiences with both practical and methodological challenges stemming from research projects based on co-production of knowledge, thereby exposing what we see as common but under-discussed obstacles, as well as guidance for tackling them. We highlight the role of social scientists in the process not merely as facilitators but also as agents that promote critical reflection and safeguard the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of both the process and its outputs. |
topic |
co-production of knowledge post-normal science experience-based knowledge science–practice interface transdisciplinary research projects science technology and innovation |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leticiaantunesnogueira conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge AT maikenbjørkan conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge AT brigtdale conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge |
_version_ |
1721212774999130112 |