Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge

Meaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leticia Antunes Nogueira, Maiken Bjørkan, Brigt Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/full
id doaj-547f757870224355a93dd4ba54115058
record_format Article
spelling doaj-547f757870224355a93dd4ba541150582021-08-10T05:42:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2021-08-01910.3389/fenvs.2021.699397699397Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of KnowledgeLeticia Antunes NogueiraMaiken BjørkanBrigt DaleMeaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participants with diverse worldviews, expertise and interests are expected to collaborate. These obstacles have not received enough attention, as current debate has focused more on the merits and principles of this approach. We address this gap by reflecting upon our experiences with both practical and methodological challenges stemming from research projects based on co-production of knowledge, thereby exposing what we see as common but under-discussed obstacles, as well as guidance for tackling them. We highlight the role of social scientists in the process not merely as facilitators but also as agents that promote critical reflection and safeguard the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of both the process and its outputs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/fullco-production of knowledgepost-normal scienceexperience-based knowledgescience–practice interfacetransdisciplinary research projectsscience technology and innovation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leticia Antunes Nogueira
Maiken Bjørkan
Brigt Dale
spellingShingle Leticia Antunes Nogueira
Maiken Bjørkan
Brigt Dale
Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
Frontiers in Environmental Science
co-production of knowledge
post-normal science
experience-based knowledge
science–practice interface
transdisciplinary research projects
science technology and innovation
author_facet Leticia Antunes Nogueira
Maiken Bjørkan
Brigt Dale
author_sort Leticia Antunes Nogueira
title Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
title_short Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
title_full Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
title_fullStr Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Conducting Research in a Post-normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-production of Knowledge
title_sort conducting research in a post-normal paradigm: practical guidance for applying co-production of knowledge
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
issn 2296-665X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Meaningful engagement between scientists and stakeholders has been extensively promoted as a tool for increasing public participation in science, as well as for increasing the relevance and impact of scientific research. Yet, co-production of knowledge entails practical challenges, since participants with diverse worldviews, expertise and interests are expected to collaborate. These obstacles have not received enough attention, as current debate has focused more on the merits and principles of this approach. We address this gap by reflecting upon our experiences with both practical and methodological challenges stemming from research projects based on co-production of knowledge, thereby exposing what we see as common but under-discussed obstacles, as well as guidance for tackling them. We highlight the role of social scientists in the process not merely as facilitators but also as agents that promote critical reflection and safeguard the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of both the process and its outputs.
topic co-production of knowledge
post-normal science
experience-based knowledge
science–practice interface
transdisciplinary research projects
science technology and innovation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leticiaantunesnogueira conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge
AT maikenbjørkan conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge
AT brigtdale conductingresearchinapostnormalparadigmpracticalguidanceforapplyingcoproductionofknowledge
_version_ 1721212774999130112