Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example
In drug development, the “onus” of the low R&D efficiency has been put traditionally onto the drug discovery process (i.e., finding the right target or “binding” functionality). Here, we show that manufacturing is not only a central component of product success, but also that, by integrating ma...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/605427 |
id |
doaj-547f6abc5b8a4be0923ec1cac5771986 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-547f6abc5b8a4be0923ec1cac57719862020-11-24T23:22:19ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/605427605427Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical ExampleJesús Zurdo0Andreas Arnell1Olga Obrezanova2Noel Smith3Ramón Gómez de la Cuesta4Thomas R. A. Gallagher5Rebecca Michael6Yvette Stallwood7Caroline Ekblad8Lars Abrahmsén9Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg10Research and Technology, Pharma & Biotech, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKResearch and Technology, Pharma & Biotech, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKApplied Protein Services, Lonza Biologics PLC, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UKAffibody AB, Gunnar Asplunds Allé 24, 171 63 Solna, SwedenAffibody AB, Gunnar Asplunds Allé 24, 171 63 Solna, SwedenAffibody AB, Gunnar Asplunds Allé 24, 171 63 Solna, SwedenIn drug development, the “onus” of the low R&D efficiency has been put traditionally onto the drug discovery process (i.e., finding the right target or “binding” functionality). Here, we show that manufacturing is not only a central component of product success, but also that, by integrating manufacturing and discovery activities in a “holistic” interpretation of QbD methodologies, we could expect to increase the efficiency of the drug discovery process as a whole. In this new context, early risk assessment, using developability methodologies and computational methods in particular, can assist in reducing risks during development in a cost-effective way. We define specific areas of risk and how they can impact product quality in a broad sense, including essential aspects such as product efficacy and patient safety. Emerging industry practices around developability are introduced, including some specific examples of applications to biotherapeutics. Furthermore, we suggest some potential workflows to illustrate how developability strategies can be introduced in practical terms during early drug development in order to mitigate risks, reduce drug attrition and ultimately increase the robustness of the biopharmaceutical supply chain. Finally, we also discuss how the implementation of such methodologies could accelerate the access of new therapeutic treatments to patients in the clinic.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/605427 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jesús Zurdo Andreas Arnell Olga Obrezanova Noel Smith Ramón Gómez de la Cuesta Thomas R. A. Gallagher Rebecca Michael Yvette Stallwood Caroline Ekblad Lars Abrahmsén Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg |
spellingShingle |
Jesús Zurdo Andreas Arnell Olga Obrezanova Noel Smith Ramón Gómez de la Cuesta Thomas R. A. Gallagher Rebecca Michael Yvette Stallwood Caroline Ekblad Lars Abrahmsén Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Jesús Zurdo Andreas Arnell Olga Obrezanova Noel Smith Ramón Gómez de la Cuesta Thomas R. A. Gallagher Rebecca Michael Yvette Stallwood Caroline Ekblad Lars Abrahmsén Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg |
author_sort |
Jesús Zurdo |
title |
Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example |
title_short |
Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example |
title_full |
Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example |
title_fullStr |
Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example |
title_full_unstemmed |
Early Implementation of QbD in Biopharmaceutical Development: A Practical Example |
title_sort |
early implementation of qbd in biopharmaceutical development: a practical example |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
In drug development, the “onus” of the low R&D efficiency has been put traditionally onto the drug discovery process (i.e., finding the right target or “binding” functionality). Here, we show that manufacturing is not only a central component of product success, but also that, by integrating manufacturing and discovery activities in a “holistic” interpretation of QbD methodologies, we could expect to increase the efficiency of the drug discovery process as a whole. In this new context, early risk assessment, using developability methodologies and computational methods in particular, can assist in reducing risks during development in a cost-effective way. We define specific areas of risk and how they can impact product quality in a broad sense, including essential aspects such as product efficacy and patient safety. Emerging industry practices around developability are introduced, including some specific examples of applications to biotherapeutics. Furthermore, we suggest some potential workflows to illustrate how developability strategies can be introduced in practical terms during early drug development in order to mitigate risks, reduce drug attrition and ultimately increase the robustness of the biopharmaceutical supply chain. Finally, we also discuss how the implementation of such methodologies could accelerate the access of new therapeutic treatments to patients in the clinic. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/605427 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jesuszurdo earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT andreasarnell earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT olgaobrezanova earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT noelsmith earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT ramongomezdelacuesta earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT thomasragallagher earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT rebeccamichael earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT yvettestallwood earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT carolineekblad earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT larsabrahmsen earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample AT ingmariehoidenguthenberg earlyimplementationofqbdinbiopharmaceuticaldevelopmentapracticalexample |
_version_ |
1725568572495757312 |