Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law

The contribution will be devoted to the comparison of damages for non-proprietary loss in public and private sphere. The regulation of service relationship will be analysed in public area, in private area the legal regulation of health injuries in labour law. The aim of the contribution will be a cr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skoruša Leopold, Horák Ondřej, Vičar Radim, Zbořil Tomáš
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-10-01
Series:Danube
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2019-0015
id doaj-547d39ba363c4a11b6fbb0147065988b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-547d39ba363c4a11b6fbb0147065988b2021-09-05T21:00:40ZengSciendoDanube1804-82852019-10-0110328529810.2478/danb-2019-0015danb-2019-0015Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service LawSkoruša Leopold0Horák Ondřej1Vičar Radim2Zbořil Tomáš3University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10Brno, Czech Republic.University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10Brno, Czech Republic.University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10Brno, Czech Republic.University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10Brno, Czech Republic.The contribution will be devoted to the comparison of damages for non-proprietary loss in public and private sphere. The regulation of service relationship will be analysed in public area, in private area the legal regulation of health injuries in labour law. The aim of the contribution will be a critical analysis of the current state of legal regulation and the proposal de lege ferenda (approximation with labour law). The addressed question is of a fundamental importance for the area of public finances, the functioning of the public area and the enforcement of the rule of law. The historical-comparative method will be used. Particular attention will be paid to the transfer of damages for personal injury to the heir – while in service relationship, such claims terminate (not transferred to the heir), which was taken from the 1960s legislation. They do not terminate after the death in current private law, if recognized or at least claimed in court. Originally, the regulation of damages in public and private law was comparable; however, after the modernization of the private law (2012/14), the protection of persons in service and their relatives becomes weaker, even though it has traditionally been contrary to it in most institutes. Different legal regulations in labour and service law are baseless in the case of damages. The authors propose to modernize the relevant laws, to bring them closer to the Labour Code, both in the possibility of a reasonable increase in damages and in the transfer of damages for pain and diminished social function to the heir.https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2019-0015damage compensationemployeeinjurylegal regulationsoldier
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Skoruša Leopold
Horák Ondřej
Vičar Radim
Zbořil Tomáš
spellingShingle Skoruša Leopold
Horák Ondřej
Vičar Radim
Zbořil Tomáš
Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
Danube
damage compensation
employee
injury
legal regulation
soldier
author_facet Skoruša Leopold
Horák Ondřej
Vičar Radim
Zbořil Tomáš
author_sort Skoruša Leopold
title Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
title_short Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
title_full Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
title_fullStr Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
title_full_unstemmed Damages for Personal Injuries – in Labour and Service Law
title_sort damages for personal injuries – in labour and service law
publisher Sciendo
series Danube
issn 1804-8285
publishDate 2019-10-01
description The contribution will be devoted to the comparison of damages for non-proprietary loss in public and private sphere. The regulation of service relationship will be analysed in public area, in private area the legal regulation of health injuries in labour law. The aim of the contribution will be a critical analysis of the current state of legal regulation and the proposal de lege ferenda (approximation with labour law). The addressed question is of a fundamental importance for the area of public finances, the functioning of the public area and the enforcement of the rule of law. The historical-comparative method will be used. Particular attention will be paid to the transfer of damages for personal injury to the heir – while in service relationship, such claims terminate (not transferred to the heir), which was taken from the 1960s legislation. They do not terminate after the death in current private law, if recognized or at least claimed in court. Originally, the regulation of damages in public and private law was comparable; however, after the modernization of the private law (2012/14), the protection of persons in service and their relatives becomes weaker, even though it has traditionally been contrary to it in most institutes. Different legal regulations in labour and service law are baseless in the case of damages. The authors propose to modernize the relevant laws, to bring them closer to the Labour Code, both in the possibility of a reasonable increase in damages and in the transfer of damages for pain and diminished social function to the heir.
topic damage compensation
employee
injury
legal regulation
soldier
url https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2019-0015
work_keys_str_mv AT skorusaleopold damagesforpersonalinjuriesinlabourandservicelaw
AT horakondrej damagesforpersonalinjuriesinlabourandservicelaw
AT vicarradim damagesforpersonalinjuriesinlabourandservicelaw
AT zboriltomas damagesforpersonalinjuriesinlabourandservicelaw
_version_ 1717782482781208576