Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)

Southeast region of Europe is firmly entrenched in the zone of interests of European and nonEuropean states, with Transnistria, due to its geographical location, turning into a strategically important subject in the twenty-first century. In the changing environment of global and regional political p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2018-04-01
Series:Управленческое консультирование
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/35
id doaj-547a9e63cf9243e8a39193a1bd7ecae7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-547a9e63cf9243e8a39193a1bd7ecae72021-09-10T11:50:28ZengNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Управленческое консультирование1726-11391816-85902018-04-010215816435Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya0Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySoutheast region of Europe is firmly entrenched in the zone of interests of European and nonEuropean states, with Transnistria, due to its geographical location, turning into a strategically important subject in the twenty-first century. In the changing environment of global and regional political powers correlation this land is becoming of particular importance to regional players such as Russia, Romania, and Ukraine. In addition, Transnistria is the territory of the frozen conflict, and its prolonged settlement plays an important part in the foreign policy of these states. This article will focus on the Transnistrian settlement within the Ukrainian political discourse. The process lasting for already over 20 years is observed through periods corresponding to certain stages of Ukrainian participation in problem solving what allows drawing a line of Ukraine’s foreign policy on that path. Since there were the two countries originally brought to the mediation mission, to consider the Ukrainian policy isolated from the steps taken by the Russian authorities would not be sufficient to assess the entire spectrum of challenges faced by the states guarantors , and the implementation of their decisions. The article also discusses the possible settlement options offered by Ukrainian authors on the basis of compliance of the first with state interests of Ukraine.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/35«трехсторонний план решения приднестровского вопроса»«приднестровский цугцванг»the transnistrian settlementukrainethe russian federationthe yushchenko plan“trilateral plan for solving the transnistrian issue”ukrainian-transnistrian relationseuropeanization of the conflict“the transnistrian zugzwang”
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya
spellingShingle Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya
Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
Управленческое консультирование
«трехсторонний план решения приднестровского вопроса»
«приднестровский цугцванг»
the transnistrian settlement
ukraine
the russian federation
the yushchenko plan
“trilateral plan for solving the transnistrian issue”
ukrainian-transnistrian relations
europeanization of the conflict
“the transnistrian zugzwang”
author_facet Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya
author_sort Tatyana Valeryevna Rostovetskaya
title Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
title_short Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
title_full Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
title_fullStr Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
title_full_unstemmed Ukraine in the Transnistrian Settlement (1992-2014)
title_sort ukraine in the transnistrian settlement (1992-2014)
publisher North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
series Управленческое консультирование
issn 1726-1139
1816-8590
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Southeast region of Europe is firmly entrenched in the zone of interests of European and nonEuropean states, with Transnistria, due to its geographical location, turning into a strategically important subject in the twenty-first century. In the changing environment of global and regional political powers correlation this land is becoming of particular importance to regional players such as Russia, Romania, and Ukraine. In addition, Transnistria is the territory of the frozen conflict, and its prolonged settlement plays an important part in the foreign policy of these states. This article will focus on the Transnistrian settlement within the Ukrainian political discourse. The process lasting for already over 20 years is observed through periods corresponding to certain stages of Ukrainian participation in problem solving what allows drawing a line of Ukraine’s foreign policy on that path. Since there were the two countries originally brought to the mediation mission, to consider the Ukrainian policy isolated from the steps taken by the Russian authorities would not be sufficient to assess the entire spectrum of challenges faced by the states guarantors , and the implementation of their decisions. The article also discusses the possible settlement options offered by Ukrainian authors on the basis of compliance of the first with state interests of Ukraine.
topic «трехсторонний план решения приднестровского вопроса»
«приднестровский цугцванг»
the transnistrian settlement
ukraine
the russian federation
the yushchenko plan
“trilateral plan for solving the transnistrian issue”
ukrainian-transnistrian relations
europeanization of the conflict
“the transnistrian zugzwang”
url https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/35
work_keys_str_mv AT tatyanavaleryevnarostovetskaya ukraineinthetransnistriansettlement19922014
_version_ 1717758270342430720