In Defense of Regulated Fee-for-Service Payment: A Response to Recent Commentaries
In health policy, magic bullet answers tend to have more appeal than incremental adjustments. Politicians faced with the daunting issues in healthcare are eager to embrace new ideas promoted by academics and think tanks. However, in implementation, intrinsic flaws in design, such as the difficulty o...
Main Author: | Naoki Ikegami |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2015-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/pdf_3055_27b628b57ccb6f97de9ea1d58ba8c80e.html |
Similar Items
-
Fee-for-Service Payment – An Evil Practice that Must be Stamped Out?
by: Naoki Ikegami
Published: (2015-02-01) -
Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Flaws in Alternatives to Fee-for-Service Payment Plans Do Not Mean Fee-for-Service Is a Good Solution to Rising Prices; Comment on “Fee-for-Service Payment - An Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?”
by: Ross Koppel
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Healthcare Reimbursement and Quality Improvement: Integration Using the Electronic Medical Record; Comment on “Fee-for-service Payment - an Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?”
by: John R. Britton
Published: (2015-08-01) -
Recent Research Areas and Grand Challenges in Electronic Medical Record: A Literature Survey Approach
by: Mohammadreza Najaftorkaman, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Japan: achieving UHC by regulating payment
by: Naoki Ikegami
Published: (2019-11-01)