Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento

This article is about curiosity as a founding category in the process of knowledge acquisition in Paulo Freire, either in common sense or in science. Based on Marx (1977) and Engels (1979) studies, one can realize that it is through the labor that human beings establish a relationship with the natur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliano Peroza, Marilúcia A. Resende
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Nove de Julho 2011-01-01
Series:EccoS Revista Científica
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71521708005
id doaj-546838ddd5d14d64b1c73f1f4ed58858
record_format Article
spelling doaj-546838ddd5d14d64b1c73f1f4ed588582020-11-25T01:02:27ZporUniversidade Nove de JulhoEccoS Revista Científica1517-19491983-92782011-01-01257794Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimentoJuliano PerozaMarilúcia A. ResendeThis article is about curiosity as a founding category in the process of knowledge acquisition in Paulo Freire, either in common sense or in science. Based on Marx (1977) and Engels (1979) studies, one can realize that it is through the labor that human beings establish a relationship with the nature, as a result of the historical dialectical materialism the curiosity can be designed as a essential factor in the gnosiological process. This way, the meaning that Paulo Freire gives to human curiosity is given by relating to its social, historical and economic conditions that the individual is emerged. For assign, in this point of view, is possible to identify in Paulo Freire the dialect of curiosity, I mean, the movement that leads the curious to exceed him. The fact of this theory not being rigorously constituted does not mean that there isn't an "episteme".Considering common sense, there is in the knowledge of curiosity "episteme" and according Paulo Freire there is also a distinction from of the relations of power, the curiosity is called "science", just because the curiosity is in the side of those who has got the power.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71521708005
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliano Peroza
Marilúcia A. Resende
spellingShingle Juliano Peroza
Marilúcia A. Resende
Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
EccoS Revista Científica
author_facet Juliano Peroza
Marilúcia A. Resende
author_sort Juliano Peroza
title Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
title_short Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
title_full Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
title_fullStr Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
title_full_unstemmed Paulo Freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
title_sort paulo freire e a dialética da curiosidade: pistas para uma praxiologia do conhecimento
publisher Universidade Nove de Julho
series EccoS Revista Científica
issn 1517-1949
1983-9278
publishDate 2011-01-01
description This article is about curiosity as a founding category in the process of knowledge acquisition in Paulo Freire, either in common sense or in science. Based on Marx (1977) and Engels (1979) studies, one can realize that it is through the labor that human beings establish a relationship with the nature, as a result of the historical dialectical materialism the curiosity can be designed as a essential factor in the gnosiological process. This way, the meaning that Paulo Freire gives to human curiosity is given by relating to its social, historical and economic conditions that the individual is emerged. For assign, in this point of view, is possible to identify in Paulo Freire the dialect of curiosity, I mean, the movement that leads the curious to exceed him. The fact of this theory not being rigorously constituted does not mean that there isn't an "episteme".Considering common sense, there is in the knowledge of curiosity "episteme" and according Paulo Freire there is also a distinction from of the relations of power, the curiosity is called "science", just because the curiosity is in the side of those who has got the power.
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71521708005
work_keys_str_mv AT julianoperoza paulofreireeadialeticadacuriosidadepistasparaumapraxiologiadoconhecimento
AT mariluciaaresende paulofreireeadialeticadacuriosidadepistasparaumapraxiologiadoconhecimento
_version_ 1725204891876458496