Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion

State coercion is an important and necessary means of maintaining law and order. But at the same time, it is a problematic sphere of relations between the authorities and society. So, the legislator is faced with the task of normative regulation of this sphere of relations. This becomes especially r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. I. Kaplunov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2020-12-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://slr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/443
id doaj-54680e481004407b8193cda67e5105fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54680e481004407b8193cda67e5105fa2021-01-09T12:33:24ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102020-12-01164518524442Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative CoercionA. I. Kaplunov0Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of the Interior of RussiaState coercion is an important and necessary means of maintaining law and order. But at the same time, it is a problematic sphere of relations between the authorities and society. So, the legislator is faced with the task of normative regulation of this sphere of relations. This becomes especially relevant in the preparation of a fundamentally new normative legal act regulating public relations for the protection (including compulsory) of an individual, society and the state from offenses that belong to the category of administrative. The article examines the legal nature of administrative coercion, implemented in the field of public administration. Critical analysis has been made of certain coercive measures enshrined in the legislation on administrative offenses, namely, measures of procedural support and measures of administrative punishment. The conclusion is formulated on the need to minimize the competence of judges in considering cases of administrative offenses. The inadmissibility of administrative liability of legal entities is substantiated. The article argues the feasibility of harmonizing the judicial and administrative order of applying administrative penalties based on the investigative type of jurisdictional law-enforcement process.https://slr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/443«следственный» и «состязательный» типы юрисдикционного правоприменительного процессаadministrative coercionadministrative responsibilityadministrative punishmentadministrative suspension of activity“investigative” and “adversarial” types of jurisdictional law enforcement process
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. I. Kaplunov
spellingShingle A. I. Kaplunov
Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
«следственный» и «состязательный» типы юрисдикционного правоприменительного процесса
administrative coercion
administrative responsibility
administrative punishment
administrative suspension of activity
“investigative” and “adversarial” types of jurisdictional law enforcement process
author_facet A. I. Kaplunov
author_sort A. I. Kaplunov
title Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
title_short Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
title_full Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
title_fullStr Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
title_full_unstemmed Administrative Responsibility as a Form of Administrative Coercion
title_sort administrative responsibility as a form of administrative coercion
publisher Omsk Law Academy
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
publishDate 2020-12-01
description State coercion is an important and necessary means of maintaining law and order. But at the same time, it is a problematic sphere of relations between the authorities and society. So, the legislator is faced with the task of normative regulation of this sphere of relations. This becomes especially relevant in the preparation of a fundamentally new normative legal act regulating public relations for the protection (including compulsory) of an individual, society and the state from offenses that belong to the category of administrative. The article examines the legal nature of administrative coercion, implemented in the field of public administration. Critical analysis has been made of certain coercive measures enshrined in the legislation on administrative offenses, namely, measures of procedural support and measures of administrative punishment. The conclusion is formulated on the need to minimize the competence of judges in considering cases of administrative offenses. The inadmissibility of administrative liability of legal entities is substantiated. The article argues the feasibility of harmonizing the judicial and administrative order of applying administrative penalties based on the investigative type of jurisdictional law-enforcement process.
topic «следственный» и «состязательный» типы юрисдикционного правоприменительного процесса
administrative coercion
administrative responsibility
administrative punishment
administrative suspension of activity
“investigative” and “adversarial” types of jurisdictional law enforcement process
url https://slr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/443
work_keys_str_mv AT aikaplunov administrativeresponsibilityasaformofadministrativecoercion
_version_ 1724343967382765568