Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.

Stuttering is a common childhood disorder. There is limited high quality evidence regarding options for best treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of direct treatment with indirect treatment in preschool children who stutter.In this multicenter randomized controlled trial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot, Elly Stolk, Toni Rietveld, Marie-Christine Franken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517884?pdf=render
id doaj-5453cd8e98b34999a1648116cca4a9f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5453cd8e98b34999a1648116cca4a9f42020-11-24T21:24:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013375810.1371/journal.pone.0133758Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.Caroline de Sonneville-KoedootElly StolkToni RietveldMarie-Christine FrankenStuttering is a common childhood disorder. There is limited high quality evidence regarding options for best treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of direct treatment with indirect treatment in preschool children who stutter.In this multicenter randomized controlled trial with an 18 month follow-up, preschool children who stutter who were referred for treatment were randomized to direct treatment (Lidcombe Program; n = 99) or indirect treatment (RESTART-DCM treatment; n = 100). Main inclusion criteria were age 3-6 years, ≥3% syllables stuttered (%SS), and time since onset ≥6 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of non-stuttering children at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included stuttering frequency (%SS), stuttering severity ratings by the parents and therapist, severity rating by the child, health-related quality of life, emotional and behavioral problems, and speech attitude.Percentage of non-stuttering children for direct treatment was 76.5% (65/85) versus 71.4% (65/91) for indirect treatment (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-2.4, p = .42). At 3 months, children treated by direct treatment showed a greater decline in %SS (significant interaction time x therapy: β = -1.89; t(282.82) = -2.807, p = .005). At 18 months, stuttering frequency was 1.2% (SD 2.1) for direct treatment and 1.5% (SD 2.1) for indirect treatment. Direct treatment had slightly better scores on most other secondary outcome measures, but no differences between treatment approaches were significant.Direct treatment decreased stuttering more quickly during the first three months of treatment. At 18 months, however, clinical outcomes for direct and indirect treatment were comparable. These results imply that at 18 months post treatment onset, both treatments are roughly equal in treating developmental stuttering in ways that surpass expectations of natural recovery. Follow-up data are needed to confirm these findings in the longer term.isrctn.org ISRCTN24362190.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517884?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot
Elly Stolk
Toni Rietveld
Marie-Christine Franken
spellingShingle Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot
Elly Stolk
Toni Rietveld
Marie-Christine Franken
Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot
Elly Stolk
Toni Rietveld
Marie-Christine Franken
author_sort Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot
title Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
title_short Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
title_full Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
title_fullStr Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
title_full_unstemmed Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial.
title_sort direct versus indirect treatment for preschool children who stutter: the restart randomized trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Stuttering is a common childhood disorder. There is limited high quality evidence regarding options for best treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of direct treatment with indirect treatment in preschool children who stutter.In this multicenter randomized controlled trial with an 18 month follow-up, preschool children who stutter who were referred for treatment were randomized to direct treatment (Lidcombe Program; n = 99) or indirect treatment (RESTART-DCM treatment; n = 100). Main inclusion criteria were age 3-6 years, ≥3% syllables stuttered (%SS), and time since onset ≥6 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of non-stuttering children at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included stuttering frequency (%SS), stuttering severity ratings by the parents and therapist, severity rating by the child, health-related quality of life, emotional and behavioral problems, and speech attitude.Percentage of non-stuttering children for direct treatment was 76.5% (65/85) versus 71.4% (65/91) for indirect treatment (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-2.4, p = .42). At 3 months, children treated by direct treatment showed a greater decline in %SS (significant interaction time x therapy: β = -1.89; t(282.82) = -2.807, p = .005). At 18 months, stuttering frequency was 1.2% (SD 2.1) for direct treatment and 1.5% (SD 2.1) for indirect treatment. Direct treatment had slightly better scores on most other secondary outcome measures, but no differences between treatment approaches were significant.Direct treatment decreased stuttering more quickly during the first three months of treatment. At 18 months, however, clinical outcomes for direct and indirect treatment were comparable. These results imply that at 18 months post treatment onset, both treatments are roughly equal in treating developmental stuttering in ways that surpass expectations of natural recovery. Follow-up data are needed to confirm these findings in the longer term.isrctn.org ISRCTN24362190.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4517884?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinedesonnevillekoedoot directversusindirecttreatmentforpreschoolchildrenwhostuttertherestartrandomizedtrial
AT ellystolk directversusindirecttreatmentforpreschoolchildrenwhostuttertherestartrandomizedtrial
AT tonirietveld directversusindirecttreatmentforpreschoolchildrenwhostuttertherestartrandomizedtrial
AT mariechristinefranken directversusindirecttreatmentforpreschoolchildrenwhostuttertherestartrandomizedtrial
_version_ 1725988050808340480