Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation

Background: The identification of the best strategy to manage cytomegalovirus infection is hampered by uncertainties regarding the risk/benefit ratios of universal prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy, the impact of indirect cytomegalovirus effects and the associated costs. This study investigated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cahue Henrique Pinto, Helio Tedesco-Silva Jr, Claudia Rosso Felipe, Alexandra Nicolau Ferreira, Marina Cristelli, Laila Almeida Viana, Wilson Aguiar, José Medina-Pestana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141386701630215X
id doaj-542f325ede624c14899418c4aa2e64ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-542f325ede624c14899418c4aa2e64ca2020-11-25T03:02:17ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1413-86702016-11-01206576584S1413-86702016000600576Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantationCahue Henrique Pinto0Helio Tedesco-Silva Jr1Claudia Rosso Felipe2Alexandra Nicolau Ferreira3Marina Cristelli4Laila Almeida Viana5Wilson Aguiar6José Medina-Pestana7Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Corresponding author.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Serviço de Urologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Hospital do Rim, Disciplina de nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, BrazilBackground: The identification of the best strategy to manage cytomegalovirus infection is hampered by uncertainties regarding the risk/benefit ratios of universal prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy, the impact of indirect cytomegalovirus effects and the associated costs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation. Methods: 144 adult kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in this 12-month study. None received cytomegalovirus pharmacological prophylaxis. Only high risk patients (positive donor/negative recipient (D+/R−), use of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, treatment of rejection) received preemptive therapy based on the result of pp65 antigenemia test. Low-risk patients with symptoms related to cytomegalovirus were screened for pp65 antigenemia and treatment initiated if confirmed cytomegalovirus disease. Blinded cytomegalovirus DNAemia was collected weekly during the first three months. Results: The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 34% and cytomegalovirus disease was 17%. The incidence was 25% in D+/R−, 69% in those receiving induction with rabbit antithymocite globulin (r-ATG), 46% in those treated for acute rejection, and 28% in low risk patients. By week 3 DNAemia was observed in 30% of patients who were not treated for cytomegalovirus infection/disease, and values ≥2.169 UI/mL showed 61% sensitivity and 85% specificity to detect cytomegalovirus disease (AUC = 0.849 ± 0.042, p < 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, only anti-thymocyte globulin induction was associated with cytomegalovirus infection/disease whereas only expanded donor criteria and renal function at 30 days were associated with renal function 12 months after transplantation. Conclusion: Targeted preemptive therapy in patients with perceived higher risk for cytomegalovirus infection/disease was effective in preventing severe clinical presentation, including tissue invasive and late cytomegalovirus infection. This strategy is associated with direct and indirect cost-savings. Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, Kidney, Transplant, Preemptive therapyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141386701630215X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cahue Henrique Pinto
Helio Tedesco-Silva Jr
Claudia Rosso Felipe
Alexandra Nicolau Ferreira
Marina Cristelli
Laila Almeida Viana
Wilson Aguiar
José Medina-Pestana
spellingShingle Cahue Henrique Pinto
Helio Tedesco-Silva Jr
Claudia Rosso Felipe
Alexandra Nicolau Ferreira
Marina Cristelli
Laila Almeida Viana
Wilson Aguiar
José Medina-Pestana
Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
author_facet Cahue Henrique Pinto
Helio Tedesco-Silva Jr
Claudia Rosso Felipe
Alexandra Nicolau Ferreira
Marina Cristelli
Laila Almeida Viana
Wilson Aguiar
José Medina-Pestana
author_sort Cahue Henrique Pinto
title Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
title_short Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
title_full Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
title_fullStr Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation
title_sort targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of cmv infection after kidney transplantation
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1413-8670
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Background: The identification of the best strategy to manage cytomegalovirus infection is hampered by uncertainties regarding the risk/benefit ratios of universal prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy, the impact of indirect cytomegalovirus effects and the associated costs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation. Methods: 144 adult kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in this 12-month study. None received cytomegalovirus pharmacological prophylaxis. Only high risk patients (positive donor/negative recipient (D+/R−), use of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, treatment of rejection) received preemptive therapy based on the result of pp65 antigenemia test. Low-risk patients with symptoms related to cytomegalovirus were screened for pp65 antigenemia and treatment initiated if confirmed cytomegalovirus disease. Blinded cytomegalovirus DNAemia was collected weekly during the first three months. Results: The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 34% and cytomegalovirus disease was 17%. The incidence was 25% in D+/R−, 69% in those receiving induction with rabbit antithymocite globulin (r-ATG), 46% in those treated for acute rejection, and 28% in low risk patients. By week 3 DNAemia was observed in 30% of patients who were not treated for cytomegalovirus infection/disease, and values ≥2.169 UI/mL showed 61% sensitivity and 85% specificity to detect cytomegalovirus disease (AUC = 0.849 ± 0.042, p < 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, only anti-thymocyte globulin induction was associated with cytomegalovirus infection/disease whereas only expanded donor criteria and renal function at 30 days were associated with renal function 12 months after transplantation. Conclusion: Targeted preemptive therapy in patients with perceived higher risk for cytomegalovirus infection/disease was effective in preventing severe clinical presentation, including tissue invasive and late cytomegalovirus infection. This strategy is associated with direct and indirect cost-savings. Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, Kidney, Transplant, Preemptive therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141386701630215X
work_keys_str_mv AT cahuehenriquepinto targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT heliotedescosilvajr targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT claudiarossofelipe targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT alexandranicolauferreira targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT marinacristelli targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT lailaalmeidaviana targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT wilsonaguiar targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT josemedinapestana targetedpreemptivetherapyaccordingtoperceivedriskofcmvinfectionafterkidneytransplantation
_version_ 1724690493258858496