Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
Despite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the subopti...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840 |
id |
doaj-541a5375737049b2adf6251508554086 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-541a5375737049b2adf62515085540862020-11-25T03:15:36ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822015-01-013412756Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in IndonesiaMatthew S. Winters0Matthew Cawvey1Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDepartment of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDespite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the suboptimal decentralisation of permitting procedures to local governments that have few incentives to support geothermal exploitation; (2) rent-seeking behaviour originating in the point-source nature of geothermal resources; (3) the opacity of central government decision making; and (4) a historically deleterious national fuel subsidy policy that disincentivised geothermal investment. We situate our arguments against the existing literature and three shadow case studies from other Pacific countries that have substantial geothermal resources. We conclude by arguing for a more centralised geothermal governance structure.http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840Political ScienceIndonesiarenewable energydecentralisationgovernance300320322330333Indonesia2000-2015National and provincial case study |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew S. Winters Matthew Cawvey |
spellingShingle |
Matthew S. Winters Matthew Cawvey Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs Political Science Indonesia renewable energy decentralisation governance 300 320 322 330 333 Indonesia 2000-2015 National and provincial case study |
author_facet |
Matthew S. Winters Matthew Cawvey |
author_sort |
Matthew S. Winters |
title |
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia |
title_short |
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia |
title_full |
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia |
title_fullStr |
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia |
title_sort |
governance obstacles to geothermal energy development in indonesia |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
issn |
1868-1034 1868-4882 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Despite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the suboptimal decentralisation of permitting procedures to local governments that have few incentives to support geothermal exploitation; (2) rent-seeking behaviour originating in the point-source nature of geothermal resources; (3) the opacity of central government decision making; and (4) a historically deleterious national fuel subsidy policy that disincentivised geothermal investment. We situate our arguments against the existing literature and three shadow case studies from other Pacific countries that have substantial geothermal resources. We conclude by arguing for a more centralised geothermal governance structure. |
topic |
Political Science Indonesia renewable energy decentralisation governance 300 320 322 330 333 Indonesia 2000-2015 National and provincial case study |
url |
http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewswinters governanceobstaclestogeothermalenergydevelopmentinindonesia AT matthewcawvey governanceobstaclestogeothermalenergydevelopmentinindonesia |
_version_ |
1724638584406802432 |