Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia

Despite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the subopti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew S. Winters, Matthew Cawvey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Subjects:
300
320
322
330
333
Online Access:http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840
id doaj-541a5375737049b2adf6251508554086
record_format Article
spelling doaj-541a5375737049b2adf62515085540862020-11-25T03:15:36ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822015-01-013412756Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in IndonesiaMatthew S. Winters0Matthew Cawvey1Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDepartment of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDespite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the suboptimal decentralisation of permitting procedures to local governments that have few incentives to support geothermal exploitation; (2) rent-seeking behaviour originating in the point-source nature of geothermal resources; (3) the opacity of central government decision making; and (4) a historically deleterious national fuel subsidy policy that disincentivised geothermal investment. We situate our arguments against the existing literature and three shadow case studies from other Pacific countries that have substantial geothermal resources. We conclude by arguing for a more centralised geothermal governance structure.http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840Political ScienceIndonesiarenewable energydecentralisationgovernance300320322330333Indonesia2000-2015National and provincial case study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew S. Winters
Matthew Cawvey
spellingShingle Matthew S. Winters
Matthew Cawvey
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Political Science
Indonesia
renewable energy
decentralisation
governance
300
320
322
330
333
Indonesia
2000-2015
National and provincial case study
author_facet Matthew S. Winters
Matthew Cawvey
author_sort Matthew S. Winters
title Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
title_short Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
title_full Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
title_fullStr Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
title_sort governance obstacles to geothermal energy development in indonesia
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
issn 1868-1034
1868-4882
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Despite having 40 per cent of the world’s potential for geothermal power production, Indonesia exploits less than five per cent of its own geothermal resources. We explore the reasons behind this lagging development of geothermal power and highlight four obstacles: (1) delays caused by the suboptimal decentralisation of permitting procedures to local governments that have few incentives to support geothermal exploitation; (2) rent-seeking behaviour originating in the point-source nature of geothermal resources; (3) the opacity of central government decision making; and (4) a historically deleterious national fuel subsidy policy that disincentivised geothermal investment. We situate our arguments against the existing literature and three shadow case studies from other Pacific countries that have substantial geothermal resources. We conclude by arguing for a more centralised geothermal governance structure.
topic Political Science
Indonesia
renewable energy
decentralisation
governance
300
320
322
330
333
Indonesia
2000-2015
National and provincial case study
url http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/840
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewswinters governanceobstaclestogeothermalenergydevelopmentinindonesia
AT matthewcawvey governanceobstaclestogeothermalenergydevelopmentinindonesia
_version_ 1724638584406802432